I'd have to see where you get this. Making terroristic threats or inciting riots are the only two "speech crimes" of which I am aware.One of these two things is not protected under the 1st Amendment and is not allowed in our country as 'free speech'.
I just looked up some Supreme Court cases before this post, but feel free to double check.
"It requires specificity, it requires intent, and it requires a sense of imminence." is how one law professor makes the distinction.
Again, can't we just get football with our football? If not, then I guess the floodgates are opened.
