GBRHouston
New member
I like positive attention, and I am not sure why some people on here are so sour towards it. I will take it while we can get it.
After watching the OSU/Wisc game I came across pretty concerned about Wisc even more so than OSU. Wisc D will be very difficult to run against. I was surprised to see how fast they moved to the ball. Both teams will be a huge challenge - I knew OSU would be now I'm equally concerned about Wisc.Their three losses last year were to Iowa and Northwestern along with Alabama. Their two losses this year are to the current #2 and #3 teams in the nation, one going to overtime and the other being a one score slugfest.
Obviously too early to tell what the entire season will look like, but that's a pretty salty team playing at a really high level with a freshman quarterback and a much improved team over 2015.
Maybe he's not a part of some conspiratorial effort to demean Nebraska. Maybe he's just bad at analyzing college football.Sure, and Tom Dienhart did not just go on a Nebraska radio station and say the Huskers are the third best team in the West at this point in the season, behind Iowa and Wisconsin. Now, he says Riley has this team in line to win the Big Ten West.
That is the point of this thread. Glad you noticed.Maybe he's not a part of some conspiratorial effort to demean Nebraska. Maybe he's just bad at analyzing college football.Sure, and Tom Dienhart did not just go on a Nebraska radio station and say the Huskers are the third best team in the West at this point in the season, behind Iowa and Wisconsin. Now, he says Riley has this team in line to win the Big Ten West.
Deinhart seems to be giving Riley this year's award based on the improvement from last season, which by all accounts was a massive underachievement, and for which Riley at least deserves some blame.I don't know, I might be a bit worried if my coach ended up the Big 10 coach of the year. Other than Dantonio you really aren't in great company when looking at the last 20+ coaches that received the award.
I get that award is more about "doing more with less" but at some point you need to build your program into something more. This year has been a down year for Dantonio but he has built something at Michigan State. The other guys on the list, they didn't accomplish much after winning the award.
I don't know if they underachieved all that much last year and it will be interesting to see how this year plays out.Deinhart seems to be giving Riley this year's award based on the improvement from last season, which by all accounts was a massive underachievement, and for which Riley at least deserves some blame.I don't know, I might be a bit worried if my coach ended up the Big 10 coach of the year. Other than Dantonio you really aren't in great company when looking at the last 20+ coaches that received the award.
I get that award is more about "doing more with less" but at some point you need to build your program into something more. This year has been a down year for Dantonio but he has built something at Michigan State. The other guys on the list, they didn't accomplish much after winning the award.
So underachievement + "over-achievement" = Coach of the Year.
Dude needs to invest in a suit that actually fits.Congrats to Coach Riley. I don't mean to take anything away from the coaching job Riley and his staff have done this year. There are numerous clear signs of progress from year 1 to year 2, and their recruiting efforts are awesome. However, I watch this clip and think, this is BTN throwing out a meaningless recognition to try and sway Husker Nation that they are for Nebraska.
Losing to BYU, Illinois, Purdue, Northwestern isn't considered underachieving? F that, I'm out.I don't know if they underachieved all that much last year and it will be interesting to see how this year plays out.Deinhart seems to be giving Riley this year's award based on the improvement from last season, which by all accounts was a massive underachievement, and for which Riley at least deserves some blame.I don't know, I might be a bit worried if my coach ended up the Big 10 coach of the year. Other than Dantonio you really aren't in great company when looking at the last 20+ coaches that received the award.
I get that award is more about "doing more with less" but at some point you need to build your program into something more. This year has been a down year for Dantonio but he has built something at Michigan State. The other guys on the list, they didn't accomplish much after winning the award.
So underachievement + "over-achievement" = Coach of the Year.
Transitioning from a toxic situation can be painful.Losing to BYU, Illinois, Purdue, Northwestern isn't considered underachieving? F that, I'm out.I don't know if they underachieved all that much last year and it will be interesting to see how this year plays out.Deinhart seems to be giving Riley this year's award based on the improvement from last season, which by all accounts was a massive underachievement, and for which Riley at least deserves some blame.I don't know, I might be a bit worried if my coach ended up the Big 10 coach of the year. Other than Dantonio you really aren't in great company when looking at the last 20+ coaches that received the award.
I get that award is more about "doing more with less" but at some point you need to build your program into something more. This year has been a down year for Dantonio but he has built something at Michigan State. The other guys on the list, they didn't accomplish much after winning the award.
So underachievement + "over-achievement" = Coach of the Year.
Agreed. We haven't beat anybody noteworthy or been horse stomping people so I don't know what some fans want. I'm very grateful we haven't dropped a game up to this point. I also like the fact we are flying under the radar. We get these next 2 games then $hit gets real. Media would love that and Nebraska would get all the attention they wanted.Some of you need to leave the fallout shelter and take off those gorgeous tin foil hats.
The thread was more about how garage of an analysis Tom Dienhart can be, but I will play the game for a moment. This was a recognition of Mid-season Coach of the Year, not most improved coaching job from last year. Looking at the current teams preseason, you had to like Ohio State because of recent success, but they were only bringing back 6 starters from last year. That is the lowest number of starters out of the 128 total FBS teams. The fact Urban Meyers has his young team playing at the level they are could easily warrant a nod for Coach of the Year. That is only one other factor to consider, so to say Riley is a default option is not completely accurate.This whole thread is weird. There are really only 4 coaches to consider for this, and 3 of them don't have vast improvements in their current winning percentages from last year. That leaves Riley.