Nah...just tired of the Hollywood elite...like they think their words carry any more weight than yours or mine.
I guess I am not in the same mind frame that the Gov't is going to be rounding up legal, documented, immigrants and shipping them back to their originating country. Does that make me naive?
I would argue this is
*exactly* missing the point:
Her purpose was to dispel the idea that Hollywood was La La Land: a cloud of élites cut off from the real America that had elected Trump. Who are we, and what is Hollywood anyway? Its just a bunch of people from other places, she said, pointing out the divergent backgrounds of the nominees, from Amy Adams to Dev Patel. An actors only job, she continued, is to enter the lives of people who are different from us, and let you feel what that feels like.
Empathy has been at the heart of Streeps world view, and of her craft. With that in mind, she pivoted to a performance that had unnerved her: Trumps mocking imitation of a disabled reporter during the campaign.
I'd welcome anyone to try and defend a position that insists Trump will in fact run an empathetic administration devoted to carrying on America's lofty ideals and tradition of multiculturalism. Given that the man has made his political fortune out of casting and vilifying outsiders, I would guess that there won't be takers on this. (That such a notion could ever be confused for being "American"...)
The more limited thesis presented -- "As long as the government isn't rounding up and deporting legal immigrants, such criticisms are unmerited" -- still deserves scrutiny. It's a stance that is tepid at best, if not hostile outright to affirming diversity. You're all welcome, too, to defend this as a reasonable position to stake out, and there we'd have to simply agree to disagree.