Elf vs Huskerboard

Elf said:
Mavric said:
Elf said:
Mavric said:
Elf said:
Mavric said:
Yes you are. You're saying that you absolutely know for a fact the entire reasoning for why he was fired.
Click to expand...
And this right here is a strawman argument. I've never once said this, nor have I implied it and yet you attribute it to me anyway. Imo, these types of attacks are dishonest in the extreme.
This is a perfect example of what Blitz is talking about.
Click to expand...
No, you never said it. You're implying it by saying my opinion is worthless unless I have connections within the program to know it's true but you're treating your own opinion as if it were an absolute fact.

That's what I'm referring to.
Click to expand...
Please quote where all I gave was my opinion. I'll wait patiently.

*Edit*

Trust me. If I tell you that's what it is, you can just believe it at face value.
Click to expand...
Your words, not mine. And this is what I was responding to when I said your opinion was worthless w/o credentials, because it is. Until you show some sort of credentials we're just a pair of schmucks on a message board. Providing credentials would mean only one of us is a schmuck, but I suspect all you have is being a schmuck, just like the rest of us.
Click to expand...
If you couldn't tell that a post that was referencing oceanfront property in Arizona was dripping in sarcasm, that explains a lot.
Click to expand...
You were trolling, again. I get that.
Click to expand...
😜

 
saunders45 said:
Elf said:
Mavric said:
Elf said:
In regards to the bold, maybe, maybe not. You can be capable of meeting those metrics but still miss the mark for various reasons, some of which might be out of your control.
Click to expand...
And if it was things that were out of your control, a competent boss would realize that and not fire you for it.
Click to expand...
Again, not necessarily. You're speaking in absolutes and there are far to many variables in human interaction to speak in absolutes.

Please quote where all I gave was my opinion. I'll wait patiently.
Click to expand...
Nothing but crickets on that one....
Click to expand...
And yet you continue to say that Riley absolutely didn't fire Banker because he realized that Banker wasn't good enough to get the job done...
Click to expand...
horsesh#t, more lies on your part.

 
MattyIce said:
Mavric said:
Elf said:
He's just pissed off because he doesn't like a certain poster here.
Click to expand...
Another troll from a mod.
Click to expand...
This is just your opinion, don't act like it's a fact.
Click to expand...
Make that my opinion also... is it a fact yet?

Elf is a great poster here. Long live elf.
Click to expand...
I must be a great poster, I got my very own thread.
default_biggrin.png


 
Elf said:
Enhance89 said:
Yeah... arguing the differences of interpretation surrounding a phrase as simple "Banker wasn't very good" is poor troll work.
Click to expand...
You need remedial reading comprehension courses if you think that's what I was arguing.
Click to expand...
You're not articulating yourself anywhere near as well as you think.

I'll say this one more time. Mavric said Banker was fired (at least in part) because he wasn't good enough. My position is, while that may be true, at this point it is simply conjecture and opinion because Riley told us why he fired Banker and it's because he was given things to improve upon and then failed in that mission.
Click to expand...
I may have wittled it down to a simple phrase, but there are few ways to interpret this statement. As I've said, what everybody is saying is far more similar than it is different, but you'd rather argue nuances and figures of speech. It's laughably absurd. So, I don't know, maybe stop acting like a victim that's misunderstood? Or perhaps just read my signature for some inspiration.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top