Yeah... arguing the differences of interpretation surrounding a phrase as simple "Banker wasn't very good" is poor troll work.
You need remedial reading comprehension courses if you think that's what I was arguing.
You're not articulating yourself anywhere near as well as you think.
I'll say this one more time. Mavric said Banker was fired (at least in part) because he wasn't good enough. My position is, while that may be true, at this point it is simply conjecture and opinion because Riley told us why he fired Banker and it's because he was given things to improve upon and then failed in that mission.
I may have wittled it down to a simple phrase, but there are few ways to interpret this statement. As I've said, what everybody is saying is far more similar than it is different, but you'd rather argue nuances and figures of speech. It's laughably absurd. So, I don't know, maybe stop acting like a victim that's misunderstood? Or perhaps just read my signature for some inspiration.