Douchebag Thread for Politics & Religion Spill Over

Dewiz said:
You believe in CNN which is fine but I don't because they've been caught more than once lying and fabricating stories before.
Click to expand...
I haven't watched CNN in years. I follow them on twitter, as one of 20 or 30 sites I follow, but this idea that people only believe in CNN without checking is false.

So you don't follow CNN.

What news source do you take seriously, Dewiz?

 
Thanks_Tom RR said:
Dewiz, I found the original quote from London Mayor Sadiq Khan that Trump was responding to:

"My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today, including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to be alarmed by this. We are the safest global city in the world. You saw last night as a consequence of our planning, our preparation, the rehearsals that take place, the swift response from the emergency services tackling the terrorists and also helping the injured.

Fox News did not report that full quotation rather reporting that the London mayor only said "no reason to be alarmed".

Trump then tweeted (maybe after seeing the misleading Fox report, though I, of course, do not know that):

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871328428963901440

So, you can see, Trump mistakenly interpreted Khan's comment to mean there is no need to be concerned about terrorist attacks, when Khan was referring to the visible increase in police activity on the streets of London. Trump got it wrong and may or may not admit that, but you and I know his error.

Trump, of course, has since sent out another tweet doubling down on his position. However, you and I can see reason and the reality of the situation and of his error in logic. We don't have to support his false narrative, am I right!?
Click to expand...
I'm was referring to this:

Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
Click to expand...
https://www.google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sadiq-khan-london-mayor-terrorism-attacks-part-and-parcel-major-cities-new-york-bombing-a7322846.html%3Famp

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Again, in context, what is wrong with that quote? People in New York, Boston, Protland, Las Vegas, Detroit, LA, etc. all need to keep an eye out. It's just a reality of this day and age.

 
Dewiz said:
Moiraine said:
Dewiz said:
knapplc said:
From Dewiz' latest trolling status update. Figured this response was better suited to the Shed and I'd save the Mods the grief of locking that idiocy on my account.
default_biggrin.png


Knapp there won't be any real conversations to be had, the P&R forum has proven that for months now. How am I trolling? These are my views and such views aren't welcomed to numerous people here so they call said poster a troll. Here's a solution for you and others, if you don't like what I say don't respond. One reason why I've avoided the P&R

Attention whore bahahaha.....you got me.
Click to expand...
The P&R forum is among the busiest on this site, with excellent conversations among people with very diverse views. The only people that fare poorly there are people who present opinions unsupported by facts, especially opinions that are easily debunked and/or shown to be foolish. You're well known for such opinions, and you've earned the level of respect commensurate with such opinions.
P&R isn't for everyone, and that obviously includes you, because you have the mind of a child. If you can't swim then stay out of the deep end. But don't cry at the people who can. It's not our fault you're bad at discussing politics.
Click to expand...
Knapp go f#*k yourself
Please amuse me on which topics I'm wrong about?
Click to expand...
There have been half a dozen or more occasions where you drop a tweet by a random far right nut job with ~14 followers, it gets proven to be completely made up bullsh#t or illogical, and then you ignore the whole thing like it never happened. Rinse and repeat. Or you offer up some completely insincere apology and berate the person who responded. Rinse and repeat.
Click to expand...
Where are these examples? You're worst than Nancy Pelosi babbling the way you are
How hard is to present evidence these days? I'm still waiting to see any Russian/Trump connections and these so-called Comey memos.

So far both those are completely bullsh#t news that haven't been proved otherwise but yet you guys keep posted that garbage in the P&R forums....rinse and repeat.
Click to expand...
Well that was easy.

 
Dewiz said:
Thanks_Tom RR said:
Dewiz, I found the original quote from London Mayor Sadiq Khan that Trump was responding to:

"My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today, including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to be alarmed by this. We are the safest global city in the world. You saw last night as a consequence of our planning, our preparation, the rehearsals that take place, the swift response from the emergency services tackling the terrorists and also helping the injured.

Fox News did not report that full quotation rather reporting that the London mayor only said "no reason to be alarmed".

Trump then tweeted (maybe after seeing the misleading Fox report, though I, of course, do not know that):

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871328428963901440

So, you can see, Trump mistakenly interpreted Khan's comment to mean there is no need to be concerned about terrorist attacks, when Khan was referring to the visible increase in police activity on the streets of London. Trump got it wrong and may or may not admit that, but you and I know his error.

Trump, of course, has since sent out another tweet doubling down on his position. However, you and I can see reason and the reality of the situation and of his error in logic. We don't have to support his false narrative, am I right!?
Click to expand...
I'm was referring to this:
Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
Click to expand...
https://www.google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sadiq-khan-london-mayor-terrorism-attacks-part-and-parcel-major-cities-new-york-bombing-a7322846.html%3Famp
Click to expand...
This is an article where the London mayor discusses how he is in favor of anti-terrorist preparedness. As this article follows shortly after the bombing in NYC, the mayor states the threat of terrorist is present and apart to him and should be for everyone. How is this a problem?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dewiz just can not help himself. He's actually incapable of anything other than ignorant, douchey, partisan cluelessness. Is it trolling if you don't know any better?

 
I don't know Dewiz and am unfamiliar with his opinions, so I am having a conversation with him. It is an easy thing, like saying good morning to a neighbor.
default_cheers.gif


 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're not actually having a conversation with him though. You're trying to offer him reasonable context and he's responding with single quotes out of context, or, "show me how it's wrong".

 
knapplc said:
Why, because there was a terrorist attack?

London is home to more than 600,000 Muslims. Three dudes go haywire and kill people, and you think that's proof that London is unsafe because of Muslims?

If that's the case, how unsafe do you think America is from White people?

Orlando workplace shooting: Former employee kills 5, then himself
Click to expand...
Should we have to worry about black people too Knapp?https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/us/2017/05/28/mississippi-shooting-8-dead-including-including-deputy-sheriff-suspect-in-custody.amp.html

My point wasnt about Muslims....but yes there are good muslims but their are also Muslims who are inspired by radical Islam.

My other point is that you have a mayor painting a different picture of London and how it's the safest place in the world but yet has been hit with two terror attacks (29 people dead?), 18 stabbings within this past month or so and fails to monitor 400 known ISIS soldiers entering London and doing anything about it. His sh**ty excuse lies to funding but when do we put funding first over the protection of innocent citizens?

How many terrorist attacks have happened in a 9 week span in the U.K.? How many in a year?

https://twitter.com/gmb/status/872028794797920257

 
Back
Top