Douchebag Thread for Politics & Religion Spill Over

No we don't, but you probably need to look up the definiton of bigot.
having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others.[/size]
There it is! So, by us calling each other dense we are of the belief that we are superior, our opinions are superior. With that we are intolerant of the others opinion. So it looks like we are both bigots (along with most of the other posters that have posted here)
I don't believe my opinions are superior to yours, and I tolerate a lot of opinions, yours included.
I do, however, think you act like an annoying kid brother.

 
No we don't, but you probably need to look up the definiton of bigot.
having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others.[/size]
There it is! So, by us calling each other dense we are of the belief that we are superior, our opinions are superior. With that we are intolerant of the others opinion. So it looks like we are both bigots (along with most of the other posters that have posted here)
I don't believe my opinions are superior to yours, and I tolerate a lot of opinions, yours included.
I do, however, think you act like an annoying kid brother.
Thanks! I appreciate you saying that our opinions are the same.

I think you act just fine.

 
ZRod, I applaud you for attempting to engage Dewitt in an honest political discussion.
All I want to do is understand where he is coming from. I think the response I got says volumes.
I thought that was patently clear. I attempted the same thing you did, with similar results, many months ago.

At least now we know his response is the same no matter who asks the questions. It confirms many theories.

 
ZRod, I applaud you for attempting to engage Dewitt in an honest political discussion.
All I want to do is understand where he is coming from. I think the response I got says volumes.
I thought that was patently clear. I attempted the same thing you did, with similar results, many months ago.At least now we know his response is the same no matter who asks the questions. It confirms many theories.
I know, I just thought there was a glimmer of hope left that we could actually have a real conversation. Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics. I guess I'm stuborn like that.
 
You are patient, and interested in having a real discussion. Those are traits we could all use more of.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.
Where/when did this happen?
I'll help you out it doesn't exist
ZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.

 
Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.
Where/when did this happen?
In one of his "Lol" statuses. He basically said he was going to post political stuff, but he had no interest in discussing it. I made the leap to trolling, but it's really more of a small step when you realize all he posts are things that are politically inflammatory in nature and start with "lol", "Ha", etc. Then he either locks his status, starts a new unrelated status, or crys foul when someone asks him to be accountable for his opinion.
Like I told him, if you're going to post inflammatory things on a message board and you're not interested in the conversation that goes with them, that's pretty much the definiton of trolling.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.
Where/when did this happen?
I'll help you out it doesn't exist
ZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.
I think you fundamentally misunderstand the point of discussion and debate.

 
Back
Top