Unfortunately this says a little something about our program recently if this is what is being talked about by other coaches this many years later.
But yeah, Suh should've won the Heisman.
What on God's green Earth does this have anything to do with the program now?
He was asked about being OC at ISU. He brought up Suh because ISU played against him then. I fail to see how that has anything to do with the Huskers now.
It's not like he was asked...."When was the last time Nebraska had any form of a dominating defensive player".
I didn't say it had anything to do directly with the program now.
My point was that there should be more relevant and recent things for opposing coaches to talk about as regards Nebraska football.
We had the mid 90's dynasty, Crouch as Heisman in 2001 and a man named Suh 8 years ago.
Maybe I'm just frustrated that is all it takes to sum up Nebraska's contribution to the CFB world for the last 24 years and this being the most recent is getting well aged.
And, to be honest, I had no idea what context or reason he had for making this statement in 2017.