Hayseed
New member
I can see North Korea and poverty, but there isn’t any global warming so that’s crazy.Because somehow SF has become the answer to North Korea, global warming and poverty as well.
I can see North Korea and poverty, but there isn’t any global warming so that’s crazy.Because somehow SF has become the answer to North Korea, global warming and poverty as well.
It started out with the OP giving a rational argument
The AD was not fired only due to the Friday after turkey day.If we contact Frost and he isn't interested in leaving UCF this season do we keep Riley around?
There's nothing absurd about it just because you don't agree with it.The title of the thread is an absurd comparison of Scott Frost with Tom Osborne.
Or if Frost refuses and Riley manages to go 6-6 and we keep him, the streak will die by the opening game of 2018.If a new coach other than Frost comes in, the hope and excitement will be more than enough to keep the streak well past a few years.
There's nothing absurd about it just because you don't agree with it.
No it is quite absurd.There's nothing absurd about it just because you don't agree with it.
It may be highly unlikely, but it's hardly absurd. If he comes to Nebraska and wins 3 NCs, he will be considered the 2nd coming of TO.No it is quite absurd.
There's nothing absurd about it just because you don't agree with it.
You just explained why your statement today is absurd.It may be highly unlikely, but it's hardly absurd. If he comes to Nebraska and wins 3 NCs, he will be considered the 2nd coming of TO.
There's nothing absurd about just because Barbra Streisand doesn't agree with it.
I could argue the greatness of TO was far beyond three championships, but I don't see the point of perpetuating this "what if" game.It may be highly unlikely, but it's hardly absurd. If he comes to Nebraska and wins 3 NCs, he will be considered the 2nd coming of TO.