Bracketology

Will Nebrasketball Make the NCAA Tournament?

  • Total voters
    107
  • Poll closed .
KingBlank said:
You guys have what is in front of you syndrome.  That team beat some good teams, this team has not.  They will not receive that chance for another few weeks.  I reserve the right for opinion to change.  No I am not very wrong, sorry I don't run with the hive Huskerboard mind.  Depth is better, pure talent.... ehh time will tell here very shortly.
Click to expand...


That team had one player that got very, very hot, and two role players that produced when they could. 

This team has 4 legit scoring threats, as well as two role players that fit their roles very, very well. Add two bigs that can produce when the can. 

'17-'18 over '13-'14 by 10, at least. 

 
KingBlank said:
Um this team has caught fire in almost the exact same way, like almost exactly, except they aren't going to beat Michigan state at Michigan state.  Or a highly ranked Wisconsin team.  The proof the following year was that Miles played WP out of position and that screwed the entire season. 
Click to expand...


This comment makes me think you haven't been following the team until recently 

 
VitMan said:
This comment makes me think you haven't been following the team until recently 
Click to expand...
That would be true I’m guessing.

FWIW, Nebraska has the best ATS record(19-6) in NCAA, so even Vegas doesn’t know how good they are yet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cdog923 said:
That team had one player that got very, very hot, and two role players that produced when they could. 

This team has 4 legit scoring threats, as well as two role players that fit their roles very, very well. Add two bigs that can produce when the can. 

'17-'18 over '13-'14 by 10, at least. 
Click to expand...
If you considered Shields a roll player not a “legit scoring threat”, well....  

Honestly would take him over Copeland even. 

 
PaulCrewe said:
If you considered Shields a roll player not a “legit scoring threat”, well....  

Honestly would take him over Copeland even. 
Click to expand...


Would you believe that, statistically, they're almost identical (2014 Shields to 2018 Copeland)? 

Extrapolated over 40 minutes, Copeland is the better player, but their numbers compared to their minutes played are eerily similar. 

 
Cdog923 said:
Would you believe that, statistically, they're almost identical (2014 Shields to 2018 Copeland)? 

Extrapolated over 40 minutes, Copeland is the better player, but their numbers compared to their minutes played are eerily similar. 
Click to expand...
That’s the thing, I wouldn’t compare Copeland and Shields. My comparison would be Copeland and Pitchford and then Roby and Shields

 
ScottyIce said:
That would be true I’m guessing.

FWIW, Nebraska has the best ATS record(19-6) in NCAA, so even Vegas doesn’t know how good they are yet.
Click to expand...
Vegas doesn't care who wins and loses, I shouldn't go into how Vegas lines work on here.  It's about perception to receive equal money on each side to take the juice home. 

 
KingBlank said:
Vegas doesn't care who wins and loses, I shouldn't go into how Vegas lines work on here.  It's about perception to receive equal money on each side to take the juice home. 
Click to expand...
True, but Vegas sets the line where they think the game will fall on. If the public opinion was higher on Nebraska, Nebraska wouldn't be 19-6 ATS.... I hope I don't need to delve any further into that for you to understand my point.

 
I was just looking at our schedule and kind of forgot but of our 4 losses, 3 are to the top 3 teams in the B1G. Our 4th loss is against the #6 team.

While we have struggled to get the big "signature" wins, we dont have any of those traditional bad losses(Yet) that seem to bite Nebraska.

We are beating teams we should beat(in conference).. That doesnt mean we get in but is nice to see. 

 
Minnesota_husker said:
I was just looking at our schedule and kind of forgot but of our 4 losses, 3 are to the top 3 teams in the B1G. Our 4th loss is against the #6 team.

While we have struggled to get the big "signature" wins, we dont have any of those traditional bad losses(Yet) that seem to bite Nebraska.

We are beating teams we should beat(in conference).. That doesnt mean we get in but is nice to see. 
Click to expand...
In overtime and on the road. So far, a much better showing than the usual losses to some bottom teams two or three time a year.

 
Back
Top