B.B. Hemingway
Donor
I don't want them to finish 5th. I'd rather they finish 2nd, losing to us every time.
Iowa 5th.....
I don't want them to finish 5th. I'd rather they finish 2nd, losing to us every time.
This the most relevant and correct statement in this entire thread. 6 wins next year is not the expectation. As is wasn't under Frank, Bill, Bo, or Mike. Never will it be the expectation nor be thought of as Ok.It's pretty damn depressing that people think the bolded is true. It's not, nor should it ever be.
It is depressing but we've already talked about this. Remember all those weeks we spent on the Scott Frost Megathread? We were saying things like:It's pretty damn depressing that people think the bolded is true. It's not, nor should it ever be.
9-2 his first year, but even Devaney went 6-4 in both year 6 and 7.What was devaneys record his first year?
Correct. For those that don't think 6-6 is acceptable, what do you propose we do if the Huskers go 6-6?6-6 is acceptable whether anyone admits it or not. People would still be excited for 2019 and expecting big things to come, as long as our losses weren't awful.
I don't think we'll go 6-6 though.
You are exactly the delusional fan that Colin Cowherd talks about. And God bess you. Your attitude is what the players and coaches must have. Yet as an objective observer, yes 8-10 wins is an unreasonable expectation.Even with the transition year, and the brutal schedule, there is no reason we can't win 7 or 8 or more if things go right. 6-6 is only accepted as acceptable because in the last 3 years we have won exactly 19 games. 6-6 used to be too crappy to make a bowl game.
Mike? Is that you?Year 2 though...I am looking for 9 at least. I feel that this staff is the real deal, and by golly it better start rockin.
This the most relevant and correct statement in this entire thread. 6 wins next year is not the expectation. As is wasn't under Frank, Bill, Bo, or Mike. Never will it be the expectation nor be thought of as Ok.
I will tell you right now 8-4 in year one is no where near what this staff wants to or aims to accomplish in year 1.You used the wrong word. I did not say "expectation". I said what is "realistic" for the first year with all the changes and the schedule.
8-4 sounds dreamy. That just isn't realistic, in my opinion. It is certainty the staff wants to accomplish.
I will tell you right now 8-4 in year one is no where near what this staff wants to or aims to accomplish in year 1.
6-6 is acceptable whether anyone admits it or not. People would still be excited for 2019 and expecting big things to come, as long as our losses weren't awful.
I don't think we'll go 6-6 though.
You are exactly the delusional fan that Colin Cowherd talks about. And God bess you. Your attitude is what the players and coaches must have. Yet as an objective observer, yes 8-10 wins is an unreasonable expectation.
It takes time for a staff to get to know the players, vice versa. It takes time to build trust and understanding. It takes time to fully implement new systems.
Meanwhile your competition is merely fine tuning, while you are building from the ground up. It places you at a real disadvantage.
Our schedule is brutal as well.
We have no developed dual threat quarterback like what the new system requires.
We will have a totally new defense scheme, third in three years.
Our coach said of our O line "we need to change their bodies". That doesn't sound like 10 wins to me.
But God bless ya, and I will be routing right along side for those 10 wins. But maybe just a little less disappointed when it doesn't happen.
Year 2 though...I am looking for 9 at least. I feel that this staff is the real deal, and by golly it better start rockin.