I'm good with it. If last class and this week is any indication of how this staff can recruit, I think they can get higher caliber players in here than a lot of what the last two staffs have brought in. I'd much rather them have their guys and be able to really get after it crootin bc of the excess schollys.
It's WAY too early for the class rankings to matter. I'll bet half those teams drop out of the top 30 by the end.
I'll take that bet! Not to early at all (um, this is a forum as well to speculate ... do we have to wait until the conclusion to post news?). I have no problem, like in past years, that Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State and Whisky will be in the Top 30. So, that means that both Michigan State and Nebraska can perhaps finish outside the Top 30. It won't surprise me at all to see one of Minny, NW and Iowa to finish in the Top 30.
I would feel good saying there will only be 4 teams in the top 25 on signing day.
Bragging rights. And I'm not counting Nebraska, just those other 8 teams. I'll bet less than 4 will be in the top 30 after signing day. (If you want to count Nebraska, then make it less than 5.)
I'm curious about this. Is there an area in the last class and so far this one that this coaching staff has recruited better than the last 2 staffs before have? On paper anyway? I'm not seeing it yet.
You listed 9 teams. I proposed either less than 5 for all 9 teams or less than 4 for my suggested 8 teams. If there's another way to define "half those teams", let me know.
I just hope they are better at finding guys who actually fit their schemes. Bo wasnt awful at that but Riley seemed to get whichever player showed interest regardless of if they fit our scheme.
I like the RB's that the new staff has recruited, compared to Riley's staff, but Bo did a good job bringing in quality RB's.
I thought Riley, at least offensively, went for guys that fit.