Adrian Martinez Injury

LumberJackSker said:
It would just be terrible if something were to happen to montez next year.
Click to expand...


While I totally get where you're coming from CU still has to play Washington and Utah who both have hellish defenses.  I'd be more worried about something terrible happening to Montez this year (especially against Utah).

 
cheekygeek said:
A message should be sent, regardless of the severity of the outcome, particularly because there was no on-field penalty (late hit or unnecessary roughness). If your daughter was raped, you wouldn’t want prosecution of the perpetrator to depend upon whether it resulted in pregnancy or not. (Analogy). How soon Martinez plays is irrelevant to this being actionable.
Click to expand...
images


 
cheekygeek said:
A message should be sent, regardless of the severity of the outcome, particularly because there was no on-field penalty (late hit or unnecessary roughness). If your daughter was raped, you wouldn’t want prosecution of the perpetrator to depend upon whether it resulted in pregnancy or not. (Analogy). How soon Martinez plays is irrelevant to this being actionable.
Click to expand...


ydm5h58.jpg


 
Minnesota_husker said:
Meh. Montez didnt cheap shot our QB. no reason to hurt his future NFL aspirations because he has crap teammates.

Now, if one of our O-lineman were to chop block the hell out of #55 and #53's knees.. I am ok with that.
Click to expand...


Montez didn't do anything, that's true. But we got to him for seven sacks and a few more QB hurries/pressures. And that's after less than a year in Frost's conditioning program.

I would venture a guess that Colorado's O Line isn't going to get so much magically better next year that they're going to keep Montez off the carpet with our guys having a full season and another off-season weight regimen under their belts. 

Now, while they're pressuring Montez next year, if they happen to remember the CU player's extracurriculars from this year, who's to say what extra oomph that could give their completely clean and legal pass rush? 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 
cheekygeek said:
A message should be sent, regardless of the severity of the outcome, particularly because there was no on-field penalty (late hit or unnecessary roughness). If your daughter was raped, you wouldn’t want prosecution of the perpetrator to depend upon whether it resulted in pregnancy or not. (Analogy). How soon Martinez plays is irrelevant to this being actionable.
Click to expand...
tenor.gif


 
knapplc said:
Montez didn't do anything, that's true. But we got to him for seven sacks and a few more QB hurries/pressures. And that's after less than a year in Frost's conditioning program.

I would venture a guess that Colorado's O Line isn't going to get so much magically better next year that they're going to keep Montez off the carpet with our guys having a full season and another off-season weight regimen under their belts. 

Now, while they're pressuring Montez next year, if they happen to remember the CU player's extracurriculars from this year, who's to say what extra oomph that could give their completely clean and legal pass rush? 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Click to expand...
That’s strictly revenge. Taking out #44 is just protecting your own players which is more important.  An injury that takes him out 1 or 2 games is sufficient. If the PAC or CU do the right thing maybe #44 learns his lesson by next year.

 
knapplc said:
That kind of thing exemplified the best defenses this program has ever had. It's also in line with the player mentality of "taking care of it on the field."
Click to expand...
I’d like to think we were about being a hard hitting physical team but clean. So physically intimidating that opponents knew better than to even try crap like that. I think dirty play could escalate into an endless cycle if done without a clear reason.  We had several clean shots on Montez but he stayed in the game because we didn’t choose to torque his leg like a pipe wrench. That’s the way the game should be played. 

 
4skers89 said:
I’d like to think we were about being a hard hitting physical team but clean. So physically intimidating that opponents knew better than to even try crap like that. I think dirty play could escalate into an endless cycle if done without a clear reason.  We had several clean shots on Montez but he stayed in the game because we didn’t choose to torque his leg like a pipe wrench. That’s the way the game should be played. 
Click to expand...


Right. Which is why I said:

knapplc said:
Now, while they're pressuring Montez next year, if they happen to remember the CU player's extracurriculars from this year, who's to say what extra oomph that could give their completely clean and legal pass rush?  
Click to expand...





 
knapplc said:
Montez didn't do anything, that's true. But we got to him for seven sacks and a few more QB hurries/pressures. And that's after less than a year in Frost's conditioning program.

I would venture a guess that Colorado's O Line isn't going to get so much magically better next year that they're going to keep Montez off the carpet with our guys having a full season and another off-season weight regimen under their belts. 

Now, while they're pressuring Montez next year, if they happen to remember the CU player's extracurriculars from this year, who's to say what extra oomph that could give their completely clean and legal pass rush? 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Click to expand...
You completely missed my point. 

Montez did nothing. I am not saying we "two hand touch" when we get to him but no reason to start twisting knees.

It is one thing to hit the guy and another to go out of your way to injure him. Not sure why that would give our guys extra oomph when Montez had nothing to do with it.

And yes, I know you said clean and legal pass rush but still think you are missing my point on this not being about Montez and making him pay for it even if its just being hit a bit harder.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top