Depth Chart Changes
- Thread starter BigRedBuster
- Start date
grandpasknee
New member
HCSF addressed that directly in the post game presser. He said that due to depth some positions were seeing little change in personnel. (Not exactly those words, but it was clear what he was saying).
Jason Sitoke
New member
F
Fru
Guest
They both fell down. That's as far as I analyzed it. I bet you're fun at parties. You remind me of the Patton Oswalt bit about Germans not understanding jokes and bringing everything to a grinding halt.
K.
Last edited:
Toe
New member
Caputo is probably most notable for being the guy who stepped on T-Mart's ankle during the A&M game.
Last edited by a moderator:
BigRedBuster
Active member
Youth movement on offense but not on defense?
Looking at the depth chart, we have
Offense:
Seniors 5 (4 starters)
Juniors 4 (0 starters)
Sophomores 8 (5 starters)
Freshmen 7 (2 starters)
Defense:
Seniors 7 (5 starters)
Juniors 9 (4 starters)
Sophomores 6 (2 starters)
Freshmen 4 (0 starters)
That junior class appears to be a real stinker on offense. This actually gives me a lot of hope for the future of our offense. These young kids are getting a lot of playing time to grow and develop as players.
Looking at the depth chart, we have
Offense:
Seniors 5 (4 starters)
Juniors 4 (0 starters)
Sophomores 8 (5 starters)
Freshmen 7 (2 starters)
Defense:
Seniors 7 (5 starters)
Juniors 9 (4 starters)
Sophomores 6 (2 starters)
Freshmen 4 (0 starters)
That junior class appears to be a real stinker on offense. This actually gives me a lot of hope for the future of our offense. These young kids are getting a lot of playing time to grow and develop as players.
Huskers93-97
New member
I am not going to the previous screen to see what was posted. But when a kid has a full ride scholarship to be a kicker. His lone job is to kick the ball through the goal post and it looks like what we saw the other day. I am pretty discouraged that is the best we can get for the six figures it cost to go to school. I could see if it was a nice looking kick that fell short at the goal line or something because he just doesnt have the leg for 54 yards. But that is not what it looked like.
Jason Sitoke
New member
Don't go down this road with me. It's wrought with peril. We do not criticize.
Unless it's to call for someone to be benched or have their scholarship pulled. That's ok.
BigRedBuster
Active member
Hmmm....it landed right in front of the center post and almost on the end line of the end zone.
Seems to me to be a kick that was perfect in direction but just not enough leg to get it there on a 54 yard attempt.
Mavric
Yoda
It was an ugly kick that was spinning sideways instead of end-over-end like it's supposed to. It started out 15 feet wide right and sliced back toward the middle.
I don't think too many people expected him to make it but it was nothing close to a well-struck kick. It might have landed on the end line but on that trajectory it would have had to be AT LEAST 20 yards longer to have a chance to be good.
