If the roles were reversed and a male was giving a female oral sex, would the girls be charged with sexual assault?
Or it could be one fifteen year old enjoying giving a blowie to another, which, good for her. My contention isn’t that it’s impossible that she was coerced in some way, my contention that I would have assumed that would have been the first thing she brought up when it went viral in her religious school and got her expelled and left having to deal with her parents. Two years out and she hasn’t thought of explaining to her parents, her school, the police that they threatened to TP her locker or that they slipped her a roofie? Doesn’t add up is all.You literally have no idea what happened before the video. Someone can be coerced into sex and that is defined as sexual assault. Same goes for threats.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sexual-assault/
Or it could be one fifteen year old enjoying giving a blowie to another, which, good for her. My contention isn’t that it’s impossible that she was coerced in some way, my contention that I would have assumed that would have been the first thing she brought up when it went viral in her religious school and got her expelled and left having to deal with her parents. Two years out and she hasn’t thought of explaining to her parents, her school, the police that they threatened to TP her locker or that they slipped her a roofie? Doesn’t add up is all.
The boys haven't been charged with sexual assault, and in your hypothetical scenario, if the boy accused the girls of assaulting him, then it would proceed as usual.
Would the media play it up as a sexual assault in my scenario?
Its just doesnt make sense to me that if no one was charged with sexual assault, why its constantly being called an assault
None of that makes your comment on blow jobs making you think it's not sexual assault make sense.
I think there are reasons to doubt her claim, but that isn't one of them.
If the boy claimed it was sexual assault, then yes. But it wouldn't be in the media if there wasn't an athlete involved, and it just so happens that not many people watch women's sports. So it likely wouldn't be in the media at all.
It's been called an alleged assault most of the time, but some articles have worded it making it appear as though Washington knew it was.
If the roles were reversed and a male was giving a female oral sex, would the girls be charged with sexual assault?
That’s possible. But that’s pure speculation.I don't think the AD is lying about this. But I do think they purposely made sure they didn't know the details.
The flip side is also true. If the two boys receiving the sexual act are under 18 they cannot consent either.A 15 year old is unable to consent to sex, by law, in the state of California. And, we are unaware how she found herself in that state.
The majority of the articles I'm reading will say that he "was charged in December in California for ____." But then I'm also seeing that the actual arrest warrant is pending approval by a judge.Has Washington been charged with anything?
As a current poster of this forum, tell me more.As a previous agent with the FBI. Some of these comments are hilarious. Most of these comments are hilarious.