DOJ Initial Russia Hearings

[commando]

кто такой Скотт Фрост

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

Did you read Guy Chamberlain's post and the comparison laid out?  I'm only stating the actual comparison I feel exist. 

It was an apple to apple comparison. That was the whole point.

Not about the history of each person, but how the same scenario sounds with the facts intact and the names switched. 

 

[MNBigRedNorth]

is this where MNbigrednorth asks "who is scott frost"?

Thanks for the jab,  we all know who Scott Frost is.  Dang glad he's here too!

 

[BigRedBuster]

@45timesbetterthanemptysuit  Questions. 

The report states that the Russuans made numerous offers to trump to help him. 

A). Why didn’t Trump report this to the appropriate officials?

B). Why did Trump cancel sanctions on Russia that Obama had put in place  immediately after taking office?

C). Why did he exhonerate Russia in Helsinki and proclaim that he believes Putin over his own intelligence community about Russia meddling?

Remember, he knew they were meddling. 

@45timesbetterthanemptysuit @Dewiz @MNBigRedNorth

Bueller?????  Bueller??????

 

[MNBigRedNorth]

It was an apple to apple comparison. That was the whole point.

Not about the history of each person, but how the same scenario sounds with the facts intact and the names switched. 

Maybe the way you see it, but not me!  We will just have to agree to disagree.  I see Hillary in a light that would surprise you!

 

[FrankWheeler]

It was an apple to apple comparison. That was the whole point.

Not about the history of each person, but how the same scenario sounds with the facts intact and the names switched. 

But Hillary did emails!  And the FISA warrant!  The liars were set up and the crimes are fake!

 

[Nebfanatic]

Maybe the way you see it, but not me!  We will just have to agree to disagree.  I see Hillary in a light that would surprise you!

Thats not the point. Look at the scenarios presented. Its not about the person which you don't seem to understand. The scenario Guy presented is concerning no matter if its Clinton or Trump. 

Quick question while I have you here. Would you consider the phrase "I moved on her like a b!^@h" misogynistic? 

 

[MNBigRedNorth]

Yes I did. 

Trump=juicy Apple=you voted for him

Clinton=sour cabbage=you didn’t vote for her. 

So, with everything the same, you would support investigation against Clinton but not Trump. 

The difference is that there is actual hard evidence that is already out there with the FAKE Dossier that was used to get the FISA and have the Obama Government spy on Trump for her campaign.  After 2 years of investigation and PROOF like many have been say about PRESIDENT Trump, there never was anything there to begin with.  The the alphabet Agency's of Obama all in for Hillary.  Why would have anyone believed one iota of what those people were saying?  So at this point Hillary and the Obama Administration need to be investigate to the fullest. 

 

[BigRedBuster]

Maybe the way you see it, but not me!  We will just have to agree to disagree.  I see Hillary in a light that would surprise you!

Because one has an R beside their name and the other has a D?

:dunno

just shooting from the hip here. 

 

[Apathy]

@45timesbetterthanemptysuit @Dewiz @MNBigRedNorth

Bueller?????  Bueller??????

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

Maybe the way you see it, but not me!  We will just have to agree to disagree.  I see Hillary in a light that would surprise you!

Would I really be surprised?

It's not a sexual attraction, is it?

 

[BigRedBuster]

So, in other words, because you voted for him and he won, you are ok with Russia influencing our elections and your candidate knowing about it and doing nothing.....well....actually rewarding Russia for it by lifting sanctions. 

And, you would yawn if Obama did the same thing. 

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

Quick question while I have you here. Would you consider the phrase "I moved on her like a b!^@h" misogynistic? 

For me the whole "pu&&y grabbing" monologue wasn't about misogyny. Donald Trump considers everyone an object.

It was more about a 58 year old man desperately wanting to impress Billy Bush with what a playah he is. I've been in a few locker rooms, and any guy who talked like that would be considered the saddest dude around.  

 

[Nebfanatic]

For me the whole "pu&&y grabbing" monologue wasn't about misogyny. Donald Trump considers everyone an object.

It was more about a 58 year old man desperately wanting to impress Billy Bush with what a playah he is. I've been in a few locker rooms, and any guy who talked like that would be considered the saddest dude around.

Whether he was trying to impress someone or not, the comments are misogynistic in nature. It's really black and white to me. Pretty telling that I can't get a straight answer from MN on the subject.

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

That's cute.  Not biting on this one!  First it's not even close to an apple to apple comparison.  More like big red juicy apple=Trump and sour cabbage=Clinton

Well I guess we could flip it.

So instead of the Clintons, imagine Donald Trump having sex with a young woman not his wife, having people pay money to gain access to him, and catching him using a private email server.

Chilling, isn't it?

And you don't even need your imagination.