Danimal
New member
Didn't Bo use a variation of the 4-2-5? The tweener position you are talking about he referred to as the Peso
Ya, was thinking along the lines of how we used to use Eric Hagg.
Didn't Bo use a variation of the 4-2-5? The tweener position you are talking about he referred to as the Peso
Ya, Hagg seemed like a perfect fit for the Peso position. Bo's Peso package, along with his match up zone coverages by the DBs, were pretty effective vs Spread Offenses. It didn't translate so well to the BIG10 though.......Ya, was thinking along the lines of how we used to use Eric Hagg.
No, because the main goal is to stop the passing game. I will say, if we had the players we had in 2009, it wouldn't really matter what defense was being run, they would have been good.Ya, Hagg seemed like a perfect fit for the Peso position. Bo's Peso package, along with his match up zone coverages by the DBs, were pretty effective vs Spread Offenses. It didn't translate so well to the BIG10 though.......![]()
No, because the main goal is to stop the passing game. I will say, if we had the players we had in 2009, it wouldn't really matter what defense was being run, they would have been good.
Bo got messed up moving to the Big Ten. He used this defense specifically to stop spread teams like Missouri. For some reason, he never adjusted.
My read on it was he insisted his defense was sound, and that if players did their jobs he wouldn't need to change. Problem is their jobs in his defense were really difficult against teams like Wisconsin. I know there were rumors players weren't doing their assignments in the infamous B1G championship game, but even if they were asking Sean Fisher to chase down Melvin Gordon on a fly sweep is a big ask.
Drawing up a "sound" defense isn't difficult, drawing up a sound defense that the players can execute is. I think Pelini's was sound across the board, and was almost revolutionary in how well it put players in places to succeed against the spread. Against other offenses, it asked a lot more of the players and we didn't have LSU-level talent other than Suh.
Agreed. Man, that 2009 defense was elite. Offense was on the other end of the spectrum that year. What could have been...My read on it was he insisted his defense was sound, and that if players did their jobs he wouldn't need to change. Problem is their jobs in his defense were really difficult against teams like Wisconsin. I know there were rumors players weren't doing their assignments in the infamous B1G championship game, but even if they were asking Sean Fisher to chase down Melvin Gordon on a fly sweep is a big ask.
Drawing up a "sound" defense isn't difficult, drawing up a sound defense that the players can execute is. I think Pelini's was sound across the board, and was almost revolutionary in how well it put players in places to succeed against the spread. Against other offenses, it asked a lot more of the players and we didn't have LSU-level talent other than Suh.
I don't know. The line is decent. I think they would look pretty good if the linebackers would do their damn job. Oh, and if we had an OLB or two that could get after the QB in one vs one situations.This all day long
The entire front 7 is garbage.
InterestingMost of the players starting today are members who played on the 2017 defense which likely the worst Nebraska defense of all time (Was 2017 the worst Nebraska defense ever?).
Front seven:
DE 96 Davis, Carlos RS SR Mike Riley recruit
NT 79 Daniels, Darrion SR/TR Transferred to play with little Bro who was a Mike Riley recuit
DE 94 Davis, Khalil RS SR Mike Riley recruit
OLB 22 Davis, Alex RS SR Mike Riley recruit
ILB 31 Miller, Collin RS JR Mike Riley recruit
ILB 7 Barry, Mohamed RS SR Mike Riley recruit
OLB 2 Tannor, Caleb SO Scott Frost recruit*
Backfield:
NB 13 Domann, JoJo RS JR Mike Riley recruit
CB 21 Jackson, Lamar SR Mike Riley recruit
SS 19 Dismuke, Marquel RS JR Mike Riley recruit
FS 5 Taylor-Britt, Cam SO Scott Frost recruit*
CB 23 Bootle, Dicaprio RS JR Mike Riley recruit
*last minute recruitment due to coaching change.
2017 "memorable" losses:
at Oregon L 35–42
Northern Illinois L 17–21
No. 9 Wisconsin L 17–38
No. 9 Ohio State L 14–56
Northwestern L 24–31 OT
at Minnesota L 21–54
at No. 13 Penn State L 44–56
Iowa L 14–56
I wonder if Frost is starting the Riley players simply because they get their dues for staying in the program (seniority) or the well is really this dry and this is all we can field.
I am waiting for the day that it is all Frost players on the field, mostly the 2019 and up class, though there are some nice 2018 pickups, it was a last minute class. Only then will we see what kind of product Frost and co. can field. I don't expect any serious changes next season either, likely might see some improvement as more Frost players get on the field but don't expect us to compete for any Western division crown.
In some ways honestly yes.Or, is Defensive recruiting under Frost a failure so far?
Glad we can agree.In some ways honestly yes.
So far.....
There are key redshirts on defense though, including Robinson, Pola-Gates, Newsome, Heinrich and Hannah.
So how 'bouts we just breathe and let them develop before we start throwing the word failure around.....
Of course it's just potential, they are redshirt freshmen.Glad we can agree.
I like the potential of those guys but that all it is.
Frosts defensive recruiting will always be a failure unless he is bringing in 5 star nose tackles consistently to run the 3-4.