knapplc
Active member
We pretty much all agree that without students physically in classrooms, there will be no football, correct?
This is not the case.
We pretty much all agree that without students physically in classrooms, there will be no football, correct?
Yeah, I sort of posted the same thoughts.I'm honestly thinking we're going to open normally, then within 2 weeks, be back to distance learning.
For the sake of argument then..This is not the case.
I think he might be talking college?For the sake of argument then..
I’d like to hear a justification for having HS football when no students are allowed in classrooms.
For the sake of argument then..
I’d like to hear a justification for having HS football when no students are allowed in classrooms.
I can't see any districts saying "Can't come to school but you can have practices and games" at the HS level.Simple justification is that students are not required to be in classrooms to learn, and they can learn remotely (this has been done successfully for decades in rural communities, especially in Alaska).
Some activities, like sports or drama or band, require students to work in close proximity. Those activities are often as important to their education as class work. So to minimize risk you have the students who can do their thing remotely do that, and those who can't get together.
You made no mention of football. And, as a parent using last semester as an example, I will argue that in person class work >> remote.Simple justification is that students are not required to be in classrooms to learn, and they can learn remotely (this has been done successfully for decades in rural communities, especially in Alaska).
Some activities, like sports or drama or band, require students to work in close proximity. Those activities are often as important to their education as class work. So to minimize risk you have the students who can do their thing remotely do that, and those who can't get together.
Where are the people that monitor this site? People come here to discuss sports and get away from all the BS going on today...and some azz hole has to inject politics.
You made no mention of football. And, as a parent using last semester as an example, I will argue that in person class work >> remote.
Simple justification is that students are not required to be in classrooms to learn, and they can learn remotely (this has been done successfully for decades in rural communities, especially in Alaska).
Some activities, like sports or drama or band, require students to work in close proximity. Those activities are often as important to their education as class work. So to minimize risk you have the students who can do their thing remotely do that, and those who can't get together.
As a teacher I will flat out agree that in person is way better than remote. It is not even close.You made no mention of football. And, as a parent using last semester as an example, I will argue that in person class work >> remote.
Some activities, like sports or drama or band, require students to work in close proximity. Those activities are often as important to their education as class work. So to minimize risk you have the students who can do their thing remotely do that, and those who can't get together.I did:
As the parent of two in school, I agree 100%.As a teacher I will flat out agree that in person is way better than remote. It is not even close.
Some activities, like sports or drama or band, require students to work in close proximity. Those activities are often as important to their education as class work. So to minimize risk you have the students who can do their thing remotely do that, and those who can't get together.
I’m not arguing that those activities don’t have educational value. They do, but not to the point of where it’s ok to ignore guidelines. Drama and band can still happen with precautions. It will look a little different, but the Ed value doesn’t diminish. My son got his band camp guidelines the other day and it mainly consists of physical distancing and not sharing sheet music, etc. Football on the other hand can’t adjust. Or, at least I don’t see how it could.
The problem with this approach is that it does penalize the non-football and other contact sports students. Why should they have to go remote if other students play activities in which proper precautions are essentially impossible?
As the parent of two in school, I agree 100%.
Right or wrong, the Nebraska state athletic association (NSAA) literally said they'd do thisI think he might be talking college?
HS football will not take place if kids are not on campus. No chance.