2020 Congressional Elections

Senator Turtle may have a strong sense that the senate is going to go Dem.  Thus he is lecturing Dems that they shouldn't do away with the filibusterer rule.  What a slimy hypocrite.   The bold below is just mind blowing.  When did The Turtle ever put himself in the other fellow's shoes. And he is lecturing the Dems.  I hope he has nothing to worry about.  I hope he loses his senate seat. 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mcconnell-warns-democrats-changing-senate-212045897.html

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has a message for Democrats: Don't end the legislative filibuster if you win control, or you'll regret it.

"The important thing for our Democratic friends to remember is you may not be in total control in the future. And any time you start fiddling around with the rules of the Senate you always need to put yourself in the other fellow's shoes and just imagine what might happen when the winds shift," the Kentucky Republican told reporters on Tuesday.

McConnell called on "responsible Democratic senators" not to be "stampeded by the hard left" and preserve "the one institution that guaranteed that America stayed in the middle of the road."

McConnell's remarks come as Democrats debate among themselves whether to preserve the super-majority requirement to pass legislation if they win control of the White House and Congress this fall and their agenda is obstructed. Numerous progressive activists, as well as former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., support its abolition.

Democrats who favor the change, including potential vice presidential contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., say the 60-vote rule gives a minority of senators a permanent veto that makes progressive governance impossible, particularly given the structure of the Senate that gives small red states like Idaho and Wyoming the same representation as large blue states like California and New York.

"If Mitch McConnell is going to do to the next Democratic president what he did to President Obama, and that is try to block every single thing he does, then we are going to roll back the filibuster," Warren said during a presidential primary debate in late February.

But other Democrats like the power it affords them to shape and block legislation while in the minority, with some of them holding more centrist views, such as Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V.

 
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article243935497.html

Lindsey is feeling the heat in the campaign so now he is giving token opposition to Trump.  The voters won't buy it as we have seen 4 years of brown nosing by Lindsey Graham.  He is going to have die politically for his support of Trump.

His opponent raised $14 million in the 2nd quarter

https://theweek.com/speedreads/924030/lindsey-graham-challenger-raises-eyepopping-14-million-2nd-quarter-topping-huge-hauls-democratic-senate-candidates

 
Ecblln3UwAA-QFp


EcbxN8PXgAAlpPf


 
Just so we're clear: You think Rand Paul is a treasonous coward?


Toss the whole lot out and let's try again with a fresh batch.

The GOP has always talked a big game about constitutional liberties, principles, law and order, etc etc.

Then we got the worst, most corrupt, most unmoored president we've ever had.

With only exceptions that I could count on one hand, they melted. Across the board.

They're all complicit. They're all enablers. Good riddance. 

 
Rand Paul is a coward.  He was totally anti trump in 2016 primaries.  He, like Lindsey Graham have done a 180 and have melted in Trump's hands. 


I see. You're not calling Rand Paul a treasonous coward per se. Just in the context of needing to have fought tooth and nail against Trump this whole time.

 
I see. You're not calling Rand Paul a treasonous coward per se. Just in the context of needing to have fought tooth and nail against Trump this whole time.




Rand Paul has been the lone vote stopping bi-partisan policy on more than one occasion.

I don't know why Collins is on there. It's like... just because she considers or occasionally does vote with Democrats that she gets trashed when she doesn't. How about obsess over the ones that always support Trump and not the ones you think might occasionally help you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see. You're not calling Rand Paul a treasonous coward per se. Just in the context of needing to have fought tooth and nail against Trump this whole time.
Not sure what game you are playing but I don't have any problem call Paul treasonous as he has supported the treasonous president. 

 
Back
Top