There is a lot more to it than just the consensus of agreement argument. There are other factors:
1. faculty are resistant to going totally online in that would go against the need for instructors on what is known as the tenure-track;
2. online was seen as a cannibalization of their specialty courses in which there were factors as quality control, accreditation, standards, competencies and so forth that were controlled by the full time faculty; online has, was, and is seen as a direct threat to this model; for example, it would be cheaper to just hire a bunch of adjunct faculty to teach all the courses and this would cause the "shared governance" model (which I believe is fast becoming a myth) to totally collapse.
3. schools also realized that if there were no students on campus, a university would just be a few buildings downtown with just a couple of administrators running the show; without active students the flavor and rich traditions that accompany the college experience were greatly dampened. With online education, you do not need that. Why spend money on a dorm if you are not going to go to a class on a campus and interact physically?
You’re right, I have no idea where your opinion comes from because you don’t care to share and refuse to believe there are alternatives that are equal to prior processes. No one is saying the days of in-class learning are over, but we have technology to reach more people now and learn at the same level in nearly every subject. Why would we turn that away?
Prior to Covid, ask Michigan why they bragged about not offering online classes compared to other Big Ten schools. My opinion, because they’re about image and prestige, trying to be different. That’s not going away.
I agree about the “app-hoppers” you describe - the bells and whistles as you’ve previously stated. I’d relate that to textbooks and “new” editions only to force students to buy new. Those profiteering aspects are in every industry and isn’t unique to LMS. Just a hunch, but I’m sure your industry has similar flaws that get you worked up over too.
I’ll reiterate, college is about what you make of it regardless of any learning style. It’s not the instructor or institutions job to make sure every student learns, participates, and passes class.
I don’t see why you’re balking at answering a question, outside of attempting to control a narrative.
Learn at the same level in nearly every subject? Ok, let's learn to do IV's online? How about taping an ankle? Hmmm...how about learning how to do mix chemicals in a lab? Ok, watch this video, get some of these chemicals like in the lab video demonstration, make sure you keep your goggles on, and we are not responsible for any mushroom clouds that occur in your neighborhood, write up your results. Let's see you demonstrate your teaching abilities in a classroom setting? Watch this video of how it is done and replicate that in an online presentation but just imagine you have a bunch of elementary school children in your presentation who are acting up and not paying attention but remember, come across like you are keeping them on task. How about actually hands-on experiences working with those who have disabilities? There are a lot more things that can be done kinesthetically or require the domain of the psychomotor skills than one realizes. Sure, a religion class, a humanities class, sure, those are your main ones but there are a lot of others.
We use the tech as a tool to supplement the learning NOT as THE learning.
You noted: [It’s not the instructor or institutions job to make sure every student learns, participates, and passes class.]
I will respond "yes" and "no". Yes meaning that students have to take responsibility. No in that there are outcomes that have to be measured. I can guarantee you that if a class gets all A's it will be seen as less rigorous and that learning is not occurring and if 1/2 the class get's D's or F's it is too rigorous and there is no learning.
You noted: [I don’t see why you’re balking at answering a question, outside of attempting to control a narrative.]
What question did you ask? I was under the assumption that I lacked experience and/or had a negative experience, thus my answer(s) to any questions would be seen as invalid.
But if you wish for me to answer this question: [What’s the difference between the student who sits in the back of class and doesn’t say a word all term and passes vs connected learning?]
I can quickly engage with a student in the back of the class because I can theoretically observe the behaviors of students when in front of a class or a group. Let me see, can you see the expressions of all students on a Zoom when your "share screen" feature is on and there is a pdf or ppt on the screen? Look, I have given conference presentations and people in the front of the room are texting just as the people in the back. Look at the heads, they are all looking down at their crotches. However, on a Zoom, I can put up a background screen and hide or move the computer screen to block off my face and just show my eyes.
Don't get me started on textbooks.