JJ Husker
Donor
I did a little math a couple days ago. Based on the deaths by age group demographic, 15-24 year olds have about a 1 in 320,000 chance of dying because of Covid. If we figure in that half that age group is girls, I would guess the chances for a male of that age would be more like 1 in 640,000. Considering D1 football players are in the top tier of health and conditioning, and toss in regular testing and a structured atmosphere, I have no idea how high that denominator number could go but I would say the chances of dying from virtually any other cause would dwarf the chance that Covid might get one of them. Also, consider most in that age group are pretty much going to do what they want, I don’t think participating in football raises their risk in any determinable way.So what’s the alternative if they cannot play? If they don’t play can they just do a year of S&C/drills within the program? I would 100% argue that it’s safer for them to be in this structured program than back at home. Especially those from minority communities. The thing that I don’t get about the positive tests:
-Why don’t they ever say how many are hospital bound/Asymptomatic
cases are reported from these numbers to calculate risk from this group? These are probably some of the healthiest people in the world. The likelihood of anyone dying within a program is exceptionally low (I realize they can transfer the virus to others yes). Probably less than if they go about their daily lives unchecked. Combine this with frequent testing and setting parameters of where and when they can go to places makes it even safer. I would 100% be okay for football to return even without fans if the alternative is no season.
Caveat- this is only based on recorded deaths by age group through June. It does not account for any other possible health detriments which may be more pervasive and/or serious.