Ruud

Yeah, he did. MUCH improved from the last two weeks, I kept hearing him mentioned alongside QB pressure, pass breakups, and big hits.

 
Not to spoil the party, but this was Iowa State!!! They didn't play that great, hell, ISU had 95+ plays and a few long drives....PLUS ISU's best weapon is a wide receiver that wouldn't start for any team other than ISU or Kansas!

Much better than last week, but there is still TONS of room for improvement!

Bring on the booger eatin, poo slinger, Chase Daniels....

GO BIG RED!!! :bonez

 
HuskerBob4 said:
Not to spoil the party, but this was Iowa State!!! They didn't play that great, hell, ISU had 95+ plays and a few long drives....PLUS ISU's best weapon is a wide receiver that wouldn't start for any team other than ISU or Kansas!

Much better than last week, but there is still TONS of room for improvement!

Bring on the booger eatin, poo slinger, Chase Daniels....

GO BIG RED!!! :bonez
Click to expand...
Is it impossible to give credit where it is due, regardless of who we played?

 
B)-->

QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:14 PM) 227270[/snapback]
Is it impossible to give credit where it is due, regardless of who we played?
For some, yes, it would seem so.

 
We still have problems on D (need to stop on 3rd down alot more) but it was a hell of a lot better than last week. Props to our D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HuskerBob4 said:
Not to spoil the party, but this was Iowa State!!! They didn't play that great, hell, ISU had 95+ plays and a few long drives....PLUS ISU's best weapon is a wide receiver that wouldn't start for any team other than ISU or Kansas!

Much better than last week, but there is still TONS of room for improvement!

Bring on the booger eatin, poo slinger, Chase Daniels....

GO BIG RED!!! :bonez
Click to expand...
The booger eatin, poo slinger has me concerned. Despite the score and some great stops today when we needed them....the D was soft.

 
agree. as much heat has he's taken...he deserved props for a good game. He still did no dominate like I think he should, but it was a good game none the less.

 
It doesn't look like there is one team with a dominating defense in the Big 12 week after week. This looks like game to game it will come down to the team with the least turn overs or turn overs at a key point of the game wins. At least we are not alone trying to shore up our defense. I know we have some very good players on this team. Sounds like they came up big today when they had to, even with all the plays ISU ran. Getting a little getter each week is what I'm hopping for.

GBR!!! :bonez

 
Back
Top