A college football player dying from covid definitely matters regardless of whether or not he contradicted it from playing football. It's evidence against the idea that only old people are dying from covid and that college-age football players won't be affected by the virus.As sad as this is, I do not believe that he caught Covid from playing football. I think it's misleading to post this is the 2020 will there be football thread.
It is evidence that none of those kids should be on campus...A college football player dying from covid definitely matters regardless of whether or not he contradicted it from playing football. It's evidence against the idea that only old people are dying from covid and that college-age football players won't be affected by the virus.
Belongs in the Covid thread then. He did not contract the virus from playing football. As I said before- this is misleading.A college football player dying from covid definitely matters regardless of whether or not he contradicted it from playing football. It's evidence against the idea that only old people are dying from covid and that college-age football players won't be affected by the virus.
So you can get lose more games and stuck in a flash flood of fair weather fans?Speaking of he ACC...
Pound for pound, let's trade Rutgers and Maryland for Boston College and Pitt.
It's one piece of evidence that cancelling the football season did not make them safer.It is evidence that none of those kids should be on campus...
But school presidents won't vote on that.
I could see them getting ducks in a row, then just voting no again. :lol:
And maybe if the vote is no, vote on why the yes schools can’t play outside of the conference for one season.It could happen but at least you will get good reasons for what/why they will be doing and that they at least made an attempt. Transparency goes a long way.
And maybe if the vote is no, vote on why the yes schools can’t play outside of the conference for one season.