Censorship

Archy1221 said:
Inciting protestors to riot is the key phrase here.  Capital never mentioned here but was by you.  
Click to expand...
i do put a little more importance on storming the capitol.....and as i recall......people were sayign people had a right to protest, not riot.    but maybe i missed president obama telling black people burn and pillage.

 
funhusker said:
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to take the stance that Twitter was right to block Trump but they are also missing the boat on a ton of other accounts.  Facebook too!  Comment sections under articles on FB are disgusting.
Click to expand...
You capture the point I am trying to make with all these posts.   Selective enforcement by twitter is terrible in my mind and millions of other conservatives.  Not the banning of Trump in particular.  It will only galvanize and give a cause for people to come together on. 

 
Archy1221 said:
Inciting violence against the sitting President and it looks like the Tweet is still up?  I would think inciting violence against a President should get the ban treatment if twitter holds same standards but they don’t. 
Click to expand...
Who the f#&% listens to Kathy Griffith or whatever her name is? And who the hell would kill someone because Kathy Griffin held up a bloody head?

 
Archy1221 said:
You capture the point I am trying to make with all these posts.   Selective enforcement by twitter is terrible in my mind and millions of other conservatives.  Not the banning of Trump in particular.  It will only galvanize and give a cause for people to come together on. 
Click to expand...
if they want to die on the hill trump is planning for them.....well....bye.

 
Archy1221 said:
2.1 million twitter followers do.  
 

only takes 1 crazy Kathy follower out of the 2.1 million.  
 

why should twitter standards and terms of service be different for her? 
Click to expand...
She doesnt have that much influence lol. Shes a comedian. Im sure all are following for jokes.

 
Archy1221 said:
You are probably right about why it’s trending, combined with people linking stories about it.  The point being, why is twitter trending a threat to the sitting Vice President while also claiming a moral attitude toward Trump and many others.  
Twitter has zero standards and it’s all arbitrary based on a few cry babies in charge there.  Isn’t Iran’s supreme leader on Twitter?  Louis Farrakhan?  
Click to expand...
All of the enemies of freedom are hypocrites and liars.  That's a given.  They don't have standards beyond their perceived immediate advantage.  But they don't respect other people.  The only way to get more fair treatment is to force them.  We just have to wait a while until the Rs are back in power.  The Ds really don't want their to be free speech, they invented the phrase "safe space."

 
Archy1221 said:
Is it your position that Twitter terms of service should be different based on job title when it comes to calls for violence 
Click to expand...
You didn't ask me, but you damn well better believe that's how it works.  And with the current setup it should.  I try to incite something.  Few, if any notice (including the twitter watchdogs).  When the leader of the free world, who has hundreds of thousands of goons willing to do just about anything for him incites something, it's pretty damn different.  Good or bad, right or wrong, up or down,  that's how the world works.  It's just the way it is.  But you know that...

 
Decoy73 said:
You didn't ask me, but you damn well better believe that's how it works.  And with the current setup it should.  I try to incite something.  Few, if any notice (including the twitter watchdogs).  When the leader of the free world, who has hundreds of thousands of goons willing to do just about anything for him incites something, it's pretty damn different.  Good or bad, right or wrong, up or down,  that's how the world works.  It's just the way it is.  But you know that...
Click to expand...
I actually did ask you and you graciously gave your answer.  
 

unfortunate you feel that way.  We shall agree to disagree then. 

 
Back
Top