I hope this post doesnt come off as bashing Chinander, because that's not my intent. However, I think we're probably still a year or 2 away from him getting serious looks as a HC, if thats a path he wants to go down. I say this because while our defense has improved tremendously, prior to this year we really werent that great. In reality, our defense has been pretty subpar the first few years, though it has improved every year and, eye test wise, stands out as a success due to the performance and consistency its displayed that our offense has not.
I think the ohio state game will be very telling. While our defense has been very solid this year on limiting points and bottling up the other offense, our bend dont break style doesnt really work that well against a team that is both more talented and very sound offensively. In hindsight, that oklahoma performance (while still looking solid) has lost some shine given how big of a bust Rattler has turned out to be. Oklahoma has struggled in almost every single game this year and now has a qb battle on its ends when one of the qbs was the preseason consensus for the heisman. Michigan St and michigan were rather 1 sided based offenses (just stop the run) that I think played very well to the strength of this defense.
We still don't have any form of a pass rush without blitzing and we still are pretty dismal at creating turnovers and creating big swings on the field position game. Historically speaking, Head Coaches that have come from the Defensive side of the ball typically have a very distinct system or produce results (creating turnovers, domination of the game) for a top 10 type team that springboard said coach to a HC role. While its been great improvement thus far and Chins has proved me wrong, I wouldn't say he's even close to either of these 2 categories.
TLDR: I like what chins has done but no im not worried he's bouncing to a HC gig as I feel like he needs to post another 2-3 years worth of top 25 caliber defenses before he'd get an honest look