theknife
New member
If he brings his QB with him, I’m in .Just saw that. Article said stepping away....Anae seems like more like a meh hire. More of a, we were "this close to getting our guy, but Anae was on our list"
If he brings his QB with him, I’m in .Just saw that. Article said stepping away....Anae seems like more like a meh hire. More of a, we were "this close to getting our guy, but Anae was on our list"
So an offensive line coach or another position coach as our next OC? I can't see a successful OC switching over from a winning program.Believe it or not teams are still playing for something at this time of the year
Believe it or not teams are still playing for something at this time of the year
No matter how many times you float this idea, it’s not gonna happen. I’m sure he’s good and all but the kid is only 7. Husker’s minimum age requirement for OC is obviously going to be 10.
That would definitely be the "our first 7 options didn't work out" hire.
Which is looking more likely the longer this drags out.
Agreed on the money, but no on everything else. Objectively, this is a sinking ship that no one with ambitions would be excited to join. I could be wrong, but outside of special circumstances (untenable personality conflict with the head coach, and need to find a new opportunity fast), we are not going to be getting the 'pick of the litter' as a feller once said.There are a number of reasons why an OC from a currently successful program may want to go to a program that is down at the moment.
One is more money.
Another is that with the soaring salaries of head coaches it may be worth the gamble for some to take the chance that they build a down program into a winner and in doing so raise their stock as a head coaching candidate.
It's one thing to maintain an already successful offense. It's another to build one up from the ashes and put your stamp in that success.
Yeah, I was thinking similar. Everyone will listen to money. Then look at expectations, stability and success. Not sure a lot of people would leave land for money that's in the Bay Ocean with sharks everywhere. You could possibly be gone in one year with that captain of the ship.Agreed on the money, but no on everything else. Objectively, this is a sinking ship that no one with ambitions would be excited to join. I could be wrong, but outside of special circumstances (untenable personality conflict with the head coach, and need to find a new opportunity fast), we are not going to be getting the 'pick of the litter' as a feller once said.
Hope I'm wrong.
The feeling I can’t shake is this. The rationale for not having an OC announced yet is that he must still be involved in a meaningful game this weekend. So I’m left wondering why, other than possibly a boatload of money, would any coach from a winning program want to relocate to this dumpster fire. No, my hopes aren’t high. Yes, I’m expecting another “Mike Riley who” moment.
This whole deal should’ve got headed in a new, hopeful direction about a week ago but instead we’re going to have another year, again, of s#!t. I really think Trev screwed up his first and best chance.
The opposite potential benefit is that if Trev fired Frost weeks ago, we would now be competing with 20 or so other programs for a new head coach; and not looking so competitive in that pool. IF the Trev/Frost 1 year experiment flames out, the odds are more favorable that the number of comparable P5 openings next year "might" be less hostile then.The feeling I can’t shake is this. The rationale for not having an OC announced yet is that he must still be involved in a meaningful game this weekend. So I’m left wondering why, other than possibly a boatload of money, would any coach from a winning program want to relocate to this dumpster fire. No, my hopes aren’t high. Yes, I’m expecting another “Mike Riley who” moment.
This whole deal should’ve got headed in a new, hopeful direction about a week ago but instead we’re going to have another year, again, of s#!t. I really think Trev screwed up his first and best chance.
I agree as far as next year possibly being a better time to find a coach(s). Maybe it will be, maybe it won’t be. But the thing that is becoming more obvious is that the program is going to flounder for another year, the year that is delivering our easiest B1G schedule in a long time, maybe the easiest since we’ve joined the B1G. My doubt comes into play when 6 or 7 wins with that schedule will be looked at as improvement. But what is more disturbing is the possibility we did nothing AND we don’t even get those 6 or 7 wins. Just seems like squandered time and another miserable year to be a fan. It will take 8+ wins and I just don’t see it shaping up that way. We are losing key players left and right, the staff is a lame duck in flux, recruiting prognosis is terrible….. I know I’m depressing but gd, how much can a fan take?The opposite potential benefit is that if Trev fired Frost weeks ago, we would now be competing with 20 or so other programs for a new head coach; and not looking so competitive in that pool. IF the Trev/Frost 1 year experiment flames out, the odds are more favorable that the number of comparable P5 openings next year "might" be less hostile then.
That would definitely be the "our first 7 options didn't work out" hire.
Which is looking more likely the longer this drags out.