The Republican Utopia

[VectorVictor]

Good Lord.....when are Republicans going to realize how f#&%ing stupid this proves they are?

After this, no other questions for the witness is necessary.  Witness is dismissed on the grounds that YOU'RE A f#&%ING IDIOT!!!

That's just it--Republicans want stupid now because it panders directly to their most active voting base--the (willfully) ignorant white, uneducated voter. 

While you have some people still being respectable in the GOP, like Cheney, you have people that have to pander to the LCDs of the world to stay politically viable.  

 

[BigRedBuster]

I agree that using the term "treason" colloquially is fine. The previous discussion was whether propaganda met the constitutional definition of providing aid and comfort to the enemy.

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/article-iii/clauses/39

And, I answered my feelings on that in my second paragraph.

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

I'm struggling to imagine a ruling dependent on if a trans person is a woman or not. 

What would be an example of that? 

How would you define men in this case? Or, I guess a better question is if you were in her shoes what would your answer have been?

Competing in sports, is a current example.

If you were born a male, you are a man. Full stop.

I would of leaned on the biological truths. A woman is someone born a female, and is physically capable of birthing children, etc. 

 

[BigRedBuster]

Competing in sports, is a current example.

If you were born a male, you are a man. Full stop.

I would of leaned by the biological truths. A woman is someone born a female, and is physically capable of birthing children, etc. 

So, if the person is born a female but isn't able to birth a child, they aren't a woman.

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

Then it's totally BS question.

I don’t think it was. I didn’t like all the BS surrounding the question, but the question itself was fair, given the current ridiculousness surrounding gender/sex.

 

[Lorewarn]

If you were born a male, you are a man. Full stop.

I would of leaned on the biological truths. A woman is someone born a female, and is physically capable of birthing children, etc. 

So now you need to define what being born male/female means, which based on 'biological truths' is not always exactly clear.

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

So, if the person is born a female but isn't able to birth a child, they aren't a woman.

I was listing female characteristics that males are naturally incapable of. It wasn’t a ‘must check all boxes’ statement…. But you knew that.

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

So now you need to define what being born male/female means, which based on 'biological truths' is not always exactly clear.

I don’t need to define that, because we all know exactly what it means. It’s pretty clear, in almost every case.

I’ve never heard of much confusion at the ultrasounds or when a baby is born.

 

[Lorewarn]

It’s pretty clear, in almost every case.

Okay so then define it.

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

Okay so then define it.

I’m not a biologist.

 

[Lorewarn]

I’m not a biologist.

Don't think you need to be a biologist if it's clear.

You're beginning to sound an awful lot like Judge Thomas :lol:  

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

You're beginning to sound an awful lot like Judge Thomas :lol:  

That was the joke!

 

[BigRedBuster]

I don’t think it was. I didn’t like all the BS surrounding the question, but the question itself was fair, given the current ridiculousness surrounding gender/sex.

So, you want litmus tests for justices. 

 

[BigRedBuster]

I was listing female characteristics that males are naturally incapable of. It wasn’t a ‘must check all boxes’ statement…. But you knew that.

So, being born a female doesn’t need to be checked. 

 

[B.B. Hemingway]

So, you want litmus tests for justices. 

Did I say I wanted them, or did I say that’s what those get togethers with Congress are, more or less.

So, being born a female doesn’t need to be checked. 

Let’s leave it up to the OBGYN when he/she is filling out the birth certificate.