TGHusker
New member
In my mind I already see him as the Dem nominee in 2024Ohhhhh, that is interesting, good for him.
I think he will run for President.
In my mind I already see him as the Dem nominee in 2024Ohhhhh, that is interesting, good for him.
I think he will run for President.
First, as a disclaimer, this is NOT my personal view. This IS the view of many in my area of Central Nebraska...and I am sure elsewhere.
I’m assuming you live in NE?In earlier posts, I didn’t express well (or at all) how complicated I understand this subject to be. Especially from a moral standpoint. I stand by where I stand on it. I think abortions should be allowed in cases of medical emergencies, rape, and incest. Any state or politician seeking to outlaw abortion (which I know there are) in those instances are as morally corrupt as those seeking abortion in an attempt to deflect moral and personal responsibility. However, most abortions are sought because of the latter, and that’s why I support these decisions going back to the states, despite the melodramatic, and anticipatory reactions to what might come next. I’ve never seen a mother regret having a child after she’s held him/her in their arms, which makes the denial of rights to a child in the womb all the more appalling.
First, as a disclaimer, this is NOT my personal view. This IS the view of many in my area of Central Nebraska...and I am sure elsewhere.
despite the melodramatic, and anticipatory reactions to what might come next.
The view of this twat tweeting on twitter and those in central NE and everywhere else who actually believe this is really genuinely coocoo for cocoa puffs. Small town chuds with no purpose LARPing as moral virtue freedom fighters, so corny lmao
You may be surprised at what else was settled law and Precedent before getting overruled.When a potential justice is asked specifically about RvW and their answer is that it’s settled law and precedent but then within months they vote to overturn…
Please provide some comparable examples. I’ll be lenient, the examples must have been decided within 4 years of the deciding justice’s confirmation hearings where they are on record stating what they subsequently voted to overturn was “settled law” and “precedent”. To be clear, THAT is the issue, not simply that something was overturned. So show me the other SC liars.You may be surprised at what else was settled law and Precedent before getting overruled.
You need to get out more. There are plenty of moms who hate their children and wish they were never born. Moms who beat their children. Moms who curse their children. Moms who kick their children out onto the street. Don't be so naive.In earlier posts, I didn’t express well (or at all) how complicated I understand this subject to be. Especially from a moral standpoint. I stand by where I stand on it. I think abortions should be allowed in cases of medical emergencies, rape, and incest. Any state or politician seeking to outlaw abortion (which I know there are) in those instances are as morally corrupt as those seeking abortion in an attempt to deflect moral and personal responsibility. However, most abortions are sought because of the latter, and that’s why I support these decisions going back to the states, despite the melodramatic, and anticipatory reactions to what might come next. I’ve never seen a mother regret having a child after she’s held him/her in their arms, which makes the denial of rights to a child in the womb all the more appalling.
I thought you were a heartbeat guy? At what point is it a “baby” then?America: where a baby is allowed a chance at life.
I think this is where the goalpost emoji gets inserted.Please provide some comparable examples. I’ll be lenient, the examples must have been decided within 4 years of the deciding justice’s confirmation hearings where they are on record stating what they subsequently voted to overturn was “settled law” and “precedent”. To be clear, THAT is the issue, not simply that something was overturned. So show me the other SC liars.