Who should our next HC be?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why Ryan Day, and why Ryan Day over Dabo?  Ryan Day hasn't built squat.  He simply took over a well oiled machine from Urban Meyer.  Remember when David Shaw was all the buzz?  Coincidentally, his best three years were his first three years after taking over a well oiled machine from Harbaugh.  In the last four years, the only year he had a winning record was the Covid year.  Nebraska is a rebuild project.  There's one name on your list that isn't like the others.  I don't understand why it's on there.  




I agree Nebraska is a rebuild project which makes me think Aranda won't accept as he has already established a good system at Baylor. 

 
Deboer's star is on the rise for sure.  He's had many 'short stops' at various schools to get to where he is at.   Not sure if he's proven he can rebuild a program like Nebraska but he's seen success wherever he's been.  
I wouldnt call it a full rebuild I guess but that team was a mess last year and he went out got a transfer QB and has the offense working right away. He even has Will Nixon contributing.

 
I wouldnt call it a full rebuild I guess but that team was a mess last year and he went out got a transfer QB and has the offense working right away. He even has Will Nixon contributing.
Yes, we have some good pieces in place via the portal.  The Pipeline needs to be built up again with more depth.  We have a good stable of RBs (if they all stay around), WR is deep and MJ is a great coach there.  The DL needs work - well I guess most of the D needs work.  I think we are good at QB as well - esp if the OL gets developed better.  

 
I really wasn't very familiar with him but after research I was impressed.  Seems like another great offensive mind with quite a few years head coaching experience at smaller schools.  With a good DC, I would be on board.  
He is! He’d be a culture fit too. There’s several midwestern assistants on his staff. He did well as OC at Indiana. The biggest question though is would he make a change one year in at Washington…Probably not but who knows. 

 
To me, that makes more of a difference if Leipold were, say, in his mid 60s. He's only 58, though. 
I was nervous about Leipold's age at first, but he's not ancient.  He can be successful at turning around the program and leaving it in a good spot if he's looking to retire in his mid-late 60s.

 
Here's a question: why DeBoer and not Leipold?


why-not-both-why-not.gif


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top