The Courts (not specific to either party)

[NM11046]

I said it elsewhere - with our state of politics and the conservativeness of the court if there was any way this could have been pinned to a liberal they would have done it.  Because they can't/didn't I think we all know it was a conservative justice.

 

[commando]

I said it elsewhere - with our state of politics and the conservativeness of the court if there was any way this could have been pinned to a liberal they would have done it.  Because they can't/didn't I think we all know it was a conservative justice.

my guess is either Ginni or Alito.   it wouldn't be the first time Alito has leaked and the last time it was also related to the abortion issue.   Ginni just seems like a loose enough cannon to do it

 

[Archy1221]

That was the first name that leapt to mind.

Which may suggest that they identified the leaker, then said "oh f#&%" and declared it an unsolved mystery.   

It would be absolutely impossible for the leaker to be Ginni

 

[commando]

it was Sam Burrito

 

[Archy1221]

my guess is either Ginni or Alito.   it wouldn't be the first time Alito has leaked and the last time it was also related to the abortion issue.   Ginni just seems like a loose enough cannon to do it

Ginni would not have had access to the document.  Someone would have had to leak it to her, then she send it to a news outlet.  The leaker would have been the person who gave it to her not actually her.  

 

[nic]

Yup. My guess is they found the leak and didn’t like the answer. Maybe Roberts did it. 

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

Ginni would not have had access to the document.  Someone would have had to leak it to her, then she send it to a news outlet.  The leaker would have been the person who gave it to her not actually her.  

Good point. Ginni Thomas would have needed to be close to someone with access to the document.

 

[commando]

Good point. Ginni Thomas would have needed to be close to someone with access to the document.

how would she get so close to anyone like that?

 

[Archy1221]

Good point. Ginni Thomas would have needed to be close to someone with access to the document.

Close to someone with access to the document that allowed her access to the document. 

how would she get so close to anyone like that?

Maybe her and Sotomayor go out for drinks?   Who knows what their relationship is.  

 

[commando]

Close to someone with access to the document that allowed her access to the document. 

so you are suggesting Clarence was the leaker

 

[commando]

Maybe her and Sotomayor go out for drinks?   Who knows what their relationship is.  

wow....that is 1 hell of a pile of BS you threw out there.

 

[Archy1221]

so you are suggesting Clarence was the leaker

How could that be your takeaway?  
 

Someone else mentioned Ginni as a leaker, I just let them know if they were correct, which is highly unlikely, (maybe .00879% chance), it would actually be the person who gave her the document as the leaker and not her. 

 

[BigRedBuster]

[No message]

 

[commando]

How could that be your takeaway?  
 

Someone else mentioned Ginni as a leaker, I just let them know if they were correct, which is highly unlikely, (maybe .00879% chance), it would actually be the person who gave her the document as the leaker and not her. 

who was she around who had access to the document?    most certainly clarence fits the bill.   anyone else is conjuncture at best.

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

How could that be your takeaway?  
 

Someone else mentioned Ginni as a leaker, I just let them know if they were correct, which is highly unlikely, (maybe .00879% chance), it would actually be the person who gave her the document as the leaker and not her. 

You give a document to a trusted aide or a bats#!t spouse.

You leak it to the media.

Please tell me this isn't going to be another one of your utterly pointless semantics dodges.