They seem mentally ill. In this case it seems to have manifested in gender dysphoria. The most recent shooter, was/were, was a transgender. Tell me what prospective, unhinged mass shooting classes are special or exempt. When thinking soundly and not clouded with contempt, I suspect you'd say none are exempt. Zero.
What would you do here? You trumpet "not one more life!!" Here it is in front of you. They've taken no action yet. What's your move?
You all want action and less platitudes.
Here it is.
Ridiculous. The top three countries for depression are Greece, Spain, and Portugal. They don't have conservative Christians?Now, what groups are the ones depressed? Is it a conservative Christian problem? What cultural issue does the US have other countries do not?
What would you do with these people? You obviously know...let's see it?I told you it's difficult. Completely overhaul the mental health system.
Let's put you in action - what would you do with these people today? You want action? I know what I'd do. What's your play?
It's good you don't make policy. Your stated prejudice against religious groups/spiritual people (cultists) is palpable contempt.No, we're calling out your hypocrisy. You're 100% focused on trans people and not the real problem. There have been
Trans people are not mentally ill. Full stop. Go educate yourself on trans people before posting about them again. Speak to a few (if they'll speak to you, that is).
As for this particular situation you keep posting? At least one of the people in that "article" aren't advocating violence, they're explaining why violence might happen. The article is pretty suspect. But let's pretend it's all real - the answer would be to remove guns from society so people who would commit violent acts with guns cannot.
THE PROBLEM IS THE GUNS. WITHOUT THE GUNS THERE WOULD BE NO MASS SHOOTINGS.
Immediately detained without bail. Investigate their networks and those people. If any risk to the innocent, detained. Then, through a fully reformed mental health system, rehab them. They do not leave until fully changed as defined by your overhauled system.What would you do with these people? You obviously know...let's see it?
These people are no different than extreme right wing nut jobs that have promoted violence towards elected officials and promoted J6. One of those people is our ex President. I personally think that if and when they break a law, they should be held accountable to the fullest extent.
It's good you don't make policy. Your stated prejudice against religious groups/spiritual people (cultists) is palpable contempt.
The people in the link are mentally ill. It manifests in gender dysphoria.
I suspect your lead-in analysis of the lone non-violent already had mitigated life loss. He/she isn't seemingly violent. Since the focus is saving lives, you state the inanimate tool is the problem, not the sociopath wielding it.
Utterly astounding.
im not getting into the gun debate between you two but @DefenderAOthe poster might want to educate himself a bit. Or speak to a few :dunnoTrans people are not mentally ill. Full stop. Go educate yourself on trans people before posting about them again. Speak to a few (if they'll speak to you, that is).
You're reading what you want to read. Not what was said. These people are mentally ill. Their mental illness has manifested, or yielded, gender identity issues.Gender dysphoria isn't mental illness. Educate yourself.
"I suspect your lead-in analysis of the lone non-violent already had mitigated life loss." - I have no idea what this word salad means.
"Since the focus is saving lives, you state the inanimate tool is the problem, not the sociopath wielding it." - Correct. The guns are the problem. Sociopaths should not have access to guns. We all agree on that. Since we can't identify the sociopaths before they commit violence, the obvious solution is to ban guns. They are unnecessary in our society - with the obvious exception of hunting to control wildlife populations.
Normal citizens do not need guns to live in a free society. Every other first-world nation has figured that out. The gun cult in America resists getting rid of guns, and thus we have a problem no other free society has to deal with.
And, you feel detaining people who have not broken the law is constitutional.Immediately detained without bail. Investigate their networks and those people. If any risk to the innocent, detained. Then, through a fully reformed mental health system, rehab them. They do not leave until fully changed as defined by your overhauled system.
So your proposal is wait and see if they break a law? Then, when they do, come back to the forum and complain about loss of life, conservatives, and guns?
You have your answer so shouldn't need to ask me gain. Reactivity is death in this scenario. Proactive measures, focused on those willing to so brazenly share their moral and mental ineptitude, is critical.
And, you feel detaining people who have not broken the law is constitutional.
Or...are we throwing the constitution out...if so....your 2nd amendment argument goes out the door.
Thanks for pointing that out - sadly that is someone I and many others have blocked on this forum for past offenses, so I'm not aware.Archy has posted data where you've made shooting-related statements that were untrue. Have you reviewed them as data drives the most informed and best decisions on a very complex subject.
So, Red Flag laws are Constitutional? You want to protect the document, these people, or possible victims?And, you feel detaining people who have not broken the law is constitutional.
Or...are we throwing the constitution out...if so....your 2nd amendment argument goes out the door.
I would obviously be monitoring this group very heavily with the FBI.