The Democrat Utopia

teachercd said:
And now the ironic part is that the D's want to get rid of Joe, who by all accounts is a decent guy who has done a good job.
Click to expand...
I agree. Biden has navigated a difficult time and America has emerged as by far the wealthiest and most prosperous country in the world by a considerable margin.

But he's also going to suffer a massive defeat. We can acknowledge that he's done a good job, but doing a good job is a bad thing in politics. Voters don't reward you for doing things, it makes him massively unpopular. If Joe isn't replaced, he's going to get obliterated in November. And that sucks, but it's not to late to change candidates who would still be an underdog, but stand a better chance of beating Trump than Biden currently does.

 
teachercd said:
And now the ironic part is that the D's want to get rid of Joe, who by all accounts is a decent guy who has done a good job.
Click to expand...


You get rid of Mendendez because he's a corrupt crook. 

You ask Joe Biden to step down because he shows concerning signs that he's not up for the demands of the Presidency.

Those are both ethical choices, none of which adds up to irony. 

 
Archy1221 said:
How?
Click to expand...
The interesting part about the border is that the issues there don't magically go away. This is wild, but stay with me.

In order to address the issues, the United States needs to spend what's called "money". Using "money", you hire staff, invest in infrastructure, and all kinds of things. By withholding "money", it makes it difficult to adequately address the issues at the border. In fact, Republicans have withheld "money" multiple times over the last few years because it's a lot better to anger farm MAGA rural voters than it is to actually fix the problem they profess to care about.

Now, I guess the Republican response to border security is similar to when guns spray the brains of children onto school walls: do absolutely nothing to address it and pray it all away.

 
Dr. Strangelove said:
The interesting part about the border is that the issues there don't magically go away. This is wild, but stay with me.

In order to address the issues, the United States needs to spend what's called "money". Using "money", you hire staff, invest in infrastructure, and all kinds of things. By withholding "money", it makes it difficult to adequately address the issues at the border. In fact, Republicans have withheld "money" multiple times over the last few years because it's a lot better to anger farm MAGA rural voters than it is to actually fix the problem they profess to care about.

Now, I guess the Republican response to border security is similar to when guns spray the brains of children onto school walls: do absolutely nothing to address it and pray it all away.
Click to expand...
Sorry, not following you here as I asked how Republicans knee capped as you say Biden ability to address the border.   You keep whining about a crappy boarder bill that was voted on in, *checks notes—-2024.   
 

Now stay with me here as things may get complicated.  Trump was President from Jan 2017- Jan 2021.   Now’s here’s the hard part….Joe took over in late Jan 2021 and boarder crossings began to disastrously increase shortly there after.   I know it’s hard to imagine, but 2021and 2024 are a couple years apart!!!

So I will ask again….How did Republicans “kneecap” Joseph Anyway Biden in 2021, 2022, 2023? 

 
Back
Top