Censorship

Archy1221 said:
One of us is using words from a United States Government official under oath.   
 

One of us is not!   I will let you decide who is who.  
Click to expand...


Savvy mathematicians will have noted that registering as Republican is something Crooks did just as recently as flirting with a liberal website, and a bit more of a commitment wouldn't you say? Also, all the other stuff Nebfanatic points out and frothy Robbie Starbuck and grandstanding Marsha Blackburn ignores.

The original and still factual assessment is that Thomas Crooks was a registered Republican who gave $15 to a Democratic PAC. Neither side should be making hay of that, with the possible exception of the mental health and gun control folk. 

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
Savvy mathematicians will have noted that registering as Republican is something Crooks did just as recently as flirting with a liberal website, and a bit more of a commitment wouldn't you say?
Click to expand...
Any chance he registered as a Republican to vote in the primary.  I believe PA is a closed primary state and it was a Democrat strategy in some elections to do this in order to go against the most extreme candidate possible in the General Election.  Savvy political strategists would have noted this.  That would make for a pretty committed Liberal if that were the case wouldn’t you say? 
 

Guy Chamberlin said:
The original and still factual assessment
Click to expand...
It’s also factual to say according to GAB and the Government Official under oath that the loser shooter espoused a liberal set of beliefs on social media in his more recent past.  

 
Archy1221 said:
Any chance he registered as a Republican to vote in the primary.  I believe PA is a closed primary state and it was a Democrat strategy in some elections to do this in order to go against the most extreme candidate possible in the General Election.  Savvy political strategists would have noted this.  That would make for a pretty committed Liberal if that were the case wouldn’t you say? 
 

It’s also factual to say according to GAB and the Government Official under oath that the loser shooter espoused a liberal set of beliefs on social media in his more recent past.  
Click to expand...


So you're sticking with "Dem Donor"

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
So you're sticking with "Dem Donor"
Click to expand...
“Donor to Democrat causes”.  
 

“Sympathetic to Liberal viewpoints and Joe Biden based on the CEO of Gab and a testifying Government Official under oath”

“loser”

”mental nut job” 

Way to skip a valid reason for him being a Registered R though.  After I went through the trouble of pointing it out for you.  
 

 
Archy1221 said:
“Donor to Democrat causes”.  
 

“Sympathetic to Liberal viewpoints and Joe Biden based on the CEO of Gab and a testifying Government Official under oath”

“loser”

”mental nut job” 

Way to skip a valid reason for him being a Registered R though.  After I went through the trouble of pointing it out for you.  
Click to expand...


When you're totally speculating, there can be a valid reason for lots of things. When you weigh the actual evidence "no valid political motive" is the reasonable default position. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/07/24/trump-shooter-attack-motive/74456439007/

Of course I'm aware of the passionate desire to link Crooks to Dems and Leftists: so Twitter douchebags can use violent rhetoric to blame Trump haters for their violent rhetoric. Either way it lands, you still have a f#&%ed up young kid with a death wish, AR-15 access, spending hours in internet wormholes. Too many of those in this country, and you probably don't want to walk through each one's political leanings. 

You need to be really confident in your Fake Registered Republican theory, or STFU. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
commando said:
so musk is suing them for not spending their money at his place of business?   hmmmm....i wonder if every business can sue people for not shopping at their business?
Click to expand...


Danny Bateman said:
Yeah that’s pretty much it.

Financial wunderkind and big free market enthusiast Elon Musk is doing just that.
Click to expand...
Not really. It's more of a breach of contract from what I interpreted. They agreed to pay for ads prior to Musk buying a controlling share of Twitter, then pulled their money once he took over. There's actually a legitimate case here depending on how the contracts were written and I could see Elmo winning. The part about them losing money because no one wanted to buy cheaper ads after he took over is tough nuts though. That's his own damn fault and not some conspiracy.

teachercd said:
I grew up with DD...still the best donuts around and their coffee is amazing.

As a kid, the strawberry frosted donut was pretty much heaven for me...with maple a very close second.
Click to expand...
Their donuts are garbage, and I'll fight anyone who says otherwise.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top