The Democrat Utopia

So, it's not true? I haven't seen contrary news.




Did you read the other replies? The guy is implying the Democrats are doing something wrong. It was pretty obvious without even looking anything up that there is probably a law in place that keeps him on the ballot and that the tweet is probably stupid, but as the person who posted it or is concerned about it, that's probably something you should look into. But you posted it without looking it up yourself or saying anything about the tweet. You seem to post tweets like this a lot - you should add your two cents. Otherwise it looks like you're in the same boat as the person tweeting it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Did you read the other replies? The guy is implying the Democrats are doing something wrong. It was pretty obvious without even looking anything up that there is probably a law in place that keeps him on the ballot and that the tweet is probably stupid, but as the person who posted it or is concerned about it, that's probably something you should look into. But you posted it without looking it up yourself or saying anything about the tweet. You seem to post tweets like this a lot - you should add your two cents. Otherwise it looks like you're in the same boat as the person tweeting it.
Thanks for your concern.

Here's my 2 cents. He's right. Evidenced by the fact that rather than supply contrary evidence, you question the tweeters ( and mine) intelligence 

 
Thanks for your concern.

Here's my 2 cents. He's right. Evidenced by the fact that rather than supply contrary evidence, you question the tweeters ( and mine) intelligence 




I don’t question it. He’s clearly a moron, based on the evidence that has been provided to you already, which you could have easily found for yourself. I had no need to look it up because I was pretty sure someone else would do that and find that there is a law keeping him on the ballot, and that’s what happened. 

 
I see this from Tuesday that indicates an active, not passive, effort. https://www.businessinsider.com/states-denying-rfk-jr-ballot-removal-2024-8?op=1

Ds sued to keep RFKjr off State ballots when they thought he would hust Biden. Now they will sue to keep him on ballots, because it will hurt Trump. 

By all means, a smart play by Ds powers that be. But, just like everything else in the past couple months...shady as hell.

I am sure you, as a Kamala supporter, would have no issue with Rs forcing States to leave Biden on the ballot...right?

 
I see this from Tuesday that indicates an active, not passive, effort. https://www.businessinsider.com/states-denying-rfk-jr-ballot-removal-2024-8?op=1

Ds sued to keep RFKjr off State ballots when they thought he would hust Biden. Now they will sue to keep him on ballots, because it will hurt Trump. 

By all means, a smart play by Ds powers that be. But, just like everything else in the past couple months...shady as hell.

I am sure you, as a Kamala supporter, would have no issue with Rs forcing States to leave Biden on the ballot...right?






The law is the law. If a stupid law is found, the people who are able to should make an attempt to change it. b!^@hing about people for arguing that the law be followed, and calling them shady for it, is weird. b!^@hing that the law is stupid is reasonable. 

 
Just an fyi but Ohio looked into the provisions for the Democrats and calling special sessions Which they didn’t have to look into.    I assume that was law also :dunno    
 

Devo and his post are saying that same standard could be held for the states he is talking about too.  
 

https://apnews.com/article/biden-ohio-ballot-48601b3522a42e2680fe40b416d0421d




First, Devo, nor his post are saying that.

Second, what happened in Ohio isn't the standard, it's the exception.

Third, the main point Devo can't seem to read, is that the law in those states is ruling that he must stay on the ballot. Democrats aren't ruling that way, the law is. Can the Democrats make exceptions for it or change it? Sure, but them not going out of their way doesn't implicate them in RFK's relation to the ballots and the law as it exists.

 
Back
Top