What did we learn? UTEP edition

Moiraine said:
I saw part of an explanation. It’s how successful one team’s offense was vs. how successful the opponent’s offense was… but scoring is only a part of the metric. A 3 yard run on first down is considered a failure, whereas a 3 yard run on 3rd and 2 is considered a success. Dunno anything else. 

But I wonder if Clemson had several sustained drives into GA territory then had to punt each time. I watched the game and it definitely didn’t seem like GA was dominating until late into the game. 

But… Clemson had less than half GA’s offense, so it seems a bit silly. 
Click to expand...


I knew it had to be something like that.  I mean, A&M lost to Notre Dame, but had more success . . . units?   Seems like an Always Sunny bit.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've watched the replay a few times now and I'm thinking If Neyor takes one or two more steps instead of diving he could have just reached out and caught that deep ball

 
I am learning not many people respect Emmet Johnson.  I've watched a bunch analysis videos and prediction stuff.  More than a handful of people saying Dowdel looked the best by far.  I think he had a good game but Emmet out gained him, had an explosive run and caught a pass.  He performs and seems his relegated back to being the 4th back.   

 
I know everyone likes to s#!t on Fidone, but it's pretty hard to do much when everyone whiffs on their blocks (5:13)

I would also like to see what he can do with more vertical routes as well



 
Last edited by a moderator:
GSG said:
I know everyone likes to s#!t on Fidone, but it's pretty hard to do much when everyone whiffs on their blocks (5:13)
Click to expand...


:yeah

I'm not going to say those are my favorite play calls.  But they're an easy way to get him the ball.  They just didn't work out.

On the one play, both blockers whiffed.  Fidone still made both guys miss.  The only reason he didn't get yards out of it is because he stepped on the sideline as he broke the second tackle.  If he gets even a fraction of a block, he'll be a nightmare trying to bring down.

 
MyBloodIsRed16 said:
I am learning not many people respect Emmet Johnson.  I've watched a bunch analysis videos and prediction stuff.  More than a handful of people saying Dowdel looked the best by far.  I think he had a good game but Emmet out gained him, had an explosive run and caught a pass.  He performs and seems his relegated back to being the 4th back.   
Click to expand...
I too have heard the Dowdell narrative since last week. He certainly looked good - don't get me wrong - but man, I hope that fumble stuff was just a fluke and not something that's indicative of why he's an "OR" alongside everyone else.

EJ ran pretty well, really all the backs had their moments, but I don't know if people don't necessarily respect EJ. I think we all kind of witnessed why all four backs are "OR" because they all seem to have some strengths and weaknesses, and so now people are kind of parsing out a hierarchy based on their personal preferences. For example, if you take away EJ's longest run, he was 7 for 29 which was a 4.14 average. Take away DD's longest run, he was a 6.14 average. And they relied on DD to bring home a TD at one point which was an opportunity EJ didn't get. The flipside to that though is would DD or any of the other backs have hit the second level as well as EJ did on his long run, and is EJ more capable of those than others?

I think time will tell. One game probably wasn't enough to really make good conclusions one way or the other.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
EJ was my favorite last year and this year so far, but I'm not someone who thinks I know better than the coaches, and I don't have any numbers to back it up. 

 
Enhance said:
I too have heard the Dowdell narrative since last week. He certainly looked good - don't get me wrong - but man, I hope that fumble stuff was just a fluke and not something that's indicative of why he's an "OR" alongside everyone else.

EJ ran pretty well, really all the backs had their moments, but I don't know if people don't necessarily respect EJ. I think we all kind of witnessed why all four backs are "OR" because they all seem to have some strengths and weaknesses, and so now people are kind of parsing out a hierarchy based on their personal preferences. For example, if you take away EJ's longest run, he was 7 for 29 which was a 4.14 average. Take away DD's longest run, he was a 6.14 average. And they relied on DD to bring home a TD at one point which was an opportunity EJ didn't get. The flipside to that though is would DD or any of the other backs have hit the second level as well as EJ did on his long run, and is EJ more capable of those than others?

I think time will tell. One game probably wasn't enough to really make good conclusions one way or the other.
Click to expand...
kinda my point tho as he was the only one with a run over 12-14 yards.  He made a guy miss and made two others take bad angles.  I think Dowdel had and opportunity for a really nice run but he lowered his shoulder on the guy instead of making a move to make him miss.  I'm happy with everyone's effort.  It would be nice to complete a game without a RB coughing up the ball.  

 
Back
Top