Yes, Bo won. If the administration wasn't behind him before, maybe they are now. If the administration isn't behind Bo, Bo will just leave and get a great job somewhere else, while the administration here gets blamed for losing our head coach and our fans go back to Callahan era levels of depression.Did he "win"? Now you have a potentially larger split between the head coach and the administration, fans taking sides against Bo or Harvey/Tom, and a perpetual state of paranoia that Bo could bolt at any time. I don't think anybody "won."The university had a right to be upset, but there was no reason to go public the way they did. That just made matters worse. Harvey's public admonishment of Bo was a shot across the bow - "Fix your sideline demeanor, or you're done at Nebraska."
This was Bo shooting back.
Bo won.
Hopefully Harvey gets that, and stops pissing our head coach off before we lose him.
Often times (especially when there is a history) an AD will call for a recomendation. Before the first Washington game there was an article that Bo recomended the WU coach to their AD. I'm not saying it wasn't a check for intrest but it isn't as clear cut or as fishy as it seems.The AD of Miami who NEEDS A HEAD FOOTBALL COACH called HEAD FOOTBALL COACH Bo Pelini and Bo took the call not really knowing what he wanted to talk about..........My "inside source" has given me a bit of info.
Hocutt called Bo, Bo took it not exactly knowing what he wanted to talk about since they know each other. Hocutt and Bo exchanged the normal family things going on, and Hocutt brought up needing to hire a new coach. He asked Pelini if he had any recommendations, Pelini gave him some info on people he's worked with and may be good candidates to interview. Eventually Hocutt quit beating around the bush, and basically asked Pelini if he might be interested. Pelini basically eventually told him thanks, but no thanks. So, Hocutt was trying to pull a coup, but he was also interested in recommendations.
Bo will be back, and really with the players we have, the ones redshirted and the ones coming in, I don't know why in the hell he would want to leave. He spent alot of blood, sweat, and tears into getting his players, and now coming round to his 4th year is when this really becomes his baby!!!! I'm telling you all now, we are going to be a "powerful player" for years to come if we can just find some offense.
And I'm the King of France
"Hey Kirby, it's been a while. Happy holidays to you too, yep kids are good. Oh really?! You guys need a coach at Miami? I hadn't heard."
:koolaid2: :koolaid2:
I'll just speak for the state of Oregon... Bo's outburst wasn't on national TV, that game wasn't broadcast out here. And it wasn't even remotely a big deal until Perlman spoke. That's when it became a national story, that's when people everywhere started talking about, because then it was, "See, even his BOSS says he was acting crazy!" I'm friends with a lot of football fans out here in Eugene - and none of them would have known anything about that story but for Perlman's public admonishment.Yes, it is. When our Chancellor feels the need to protect our University's "image" because the HC of our football program was tough on officials, it gives off the complete feel of a 'holier than thou' attitude. Coaches riding officials and players is a reality of any program - deal with it.i completely get what you are saying. its not holier than thou.
Try this: Harvey is simply doing for the university as what you so clearly outlined in your post. The tone of the articles after Harveys announcements, and moreso the fanbases venom, was then directed at Perlman and whether or not what he did was right. Politics.
To your last part - no. The national media, and even folks from around here applauded Harvey and TO for supposedly squashing this issue. I was one of the few at the time who took exception to what happened, especially on this board. But then the reality was, just as it is now, that our administration blew it up by bringing more attention to it by publicly calling Bo out.
And really, Harvey doesn't have jack to worry about with bad press. All Harvey needs to do (as he always has done) is appease the folks who keep pumping money into the University and keep them happy. Otherwise, Harvey needs to sit back ST.. up, and let Tom Osborne worry about Bo, just like Osborne has done from day 1.
you need to take off the rose colored glasses. Bo's outburst was on national TV, LIVE, and headlines after on ESPN.com were highlighting such, well before Harvey made his comments on Sunday. People act like it would have magically gone away if Harvey never would have opened his mouth. Also, it was far from within the norm. The man was a fire spewing demon throughout the game. I was amazed he didnt have more than the one personal foul called on him.
We'll never know, but my guess is that if Harvey never said anything, that we'd have another Lawrence Phillips type backlash on our hands. That you can get away with anything at Nebraska. They were going to make news about it however they could. When Harvey came out and admonished Bo, it turned from "Coach goes apesh#t" to "Boss unhappy with employee for going apesh#t." Either way, I said on this board that nationally it would all blow over within a week. It mostly did. The only ones arguing about it now are people like you and me, fans on the 'same side.'
not at all. Ive defended bo, whatever happened, for talking to miami throughout this thread. All im trying to say is that sometimes sh#t happens, and highlighting the possibility that there are even higher powers at work thru all of this. In the grand scope, bo is a small dog with a big bark. An important one, sure. But i will never confuse that with the bites that really run the joint, harvey included. If rumors are what this board is about, im curious to why the ones i was hearing about big time donors being pretty damn upset with the happenings at the aTm game not getting any airtime. And im firmly in the camp that each party involved did what they thought they had to do. Who is right? Who is wrong? I personally dont know. But my belief is harvey did nothing wrong. And it should have ended there.You wouldn't, but would you blame that executive for wanting to leave?
I see it something where a professional relationship was harmed a little needlessly, hard to say if necessarily or not, and Bo is continuing that path. Makes me wonder how long he will stay here.
Yeah this is actually about the first time I'm hearing of this.why the ones i was hearing about big time donors being pretty damn upset with the happenings at the aTm game not getting any airtime
(Nebraska OL commit Ryan) Klatchko said Pelini openly discussed the situation during their meeting on Thursday.
“We talked about how rumors negatively affect people,” Klatchko said. “People can tear you apart on the web.
“The big thing we talked about is, if you have questions, ask. Coaches at Nebraska are really good about that. They’ll tell you what’s up. It’s good to know the coaches are honest and up front and have your back with that.”
I AgreeCoach Pelini has had several out bursts. It is just him. I think he will get it under control, and he needs to.
I think so too, but if the Refs made intentionally bad calls to get back at Pelini they should be the ones being disciplined not him.but I think he actually made the situation worse