Sub-Husker
New member
And what is wrong with those jobs?The majority of jobs have been Federal/gov't/state increases.........i.e. exploding the public union sector..........i.e. Obama supporters.........
And what is wrong with those jobs?The majority of jobs have been Federal/gov't/state increases.........i.e. exploding the public union sector..........i.e. Obama supporters.........
It's easy to say that about any Republican candidate... until you realize that the competition is other Republican candidates.There is no way a plurality will elect Mitt Romney, and he's the most-electable candidate the Republicans have. Romney will be shredded by Obama in debates. He has a worse record on jobs, he is extremely vulnerable - via his own words - on healthcare, and he's easily painted as a wealth elite out of touch with mainstream America.
Nothing in and of itself..............except that it represents an ever-increasing public sector that must be paid for..............often with wages and benefits far superior to the private sector.And what is wrong with those jobs?The majority of jobs have been Federal/gov't/state increases.........i.e. exploding the public union sector..........i.e. Obama supporters.........
Four years ago I won a bet with four to one odds that Hillary Clinton would not be the Democrat nominee.Mark it down. BO will NOT be re-elected...............and it may not even be close....................(if I'm wrong, feel free to resurrect this thread and I'll own it)............but I just don't see it.
And the true problem there is that wages and benefits in the private sector are declining.Nothing in and of itself..............except that it represents an ever-increasing public sector that must be paid for..............often with wages and benefits far superior to the private sector.And what is wrong with those jobs?The majority of jobs have been Federal/gov't/state increases.........i.e. exploding the public union sector..........i.e. Obama supporters.........
Hope you have a small ranch....................Four years ago I won a bet with four to one odds that Hillary Clinton would not be the Democrat nominee.Mark it down. BO will NOT be re-elected...............and it may not even be close....................(if I'm wrong, feel free to resurrect this thread and I'll own it)............but I just don't see it.
Then I bet on the general election and gave McCain +80.
I would bet the ranch on Obama winning in 2012.
From my point of view, Ma and Pa america has about 20 years left at best. Once the baby boom generation dies off it's their kids, the gen-x-y-next-whatever label they want to put on all of them, that will control the country, and they already have had numbers enough to push Obama over the threashold into office and keep Ron Paul in primaries, twice. That day is coming my friend, fast. Assuming the current system hasn't completely blown up from bubbles, the fed, etc before then.The problem with Ron Paul is that neither party will work with him. He'll try to push this radical agenda and NOBODY will play ball. Why? Because if they support his agenda, they'll have to answer for it come next election cycle, and they'll get voted out. Ma and Pa America aren't ready for Ron Paul's ideas. Probably won't be for a long time, if ever.
Didn't we just go over this?<snip>.........except that it represents an ever-increasing public sector that must be paid for.......<snip>
It got bigger after 2008, and I have 2012 expansion plans.Hope you have a small ranch....................Four years ago I won a bet with four to one odds that Hillary Clinton would not be the Democrat nominee.Mark it down. BO will NOT be re-elected...............and it may not even be close....................(if I'm wrong, feel free to resurrect this thread and I'll own it)............but I just don't see it.
Then I bet on the general election and gave McCain +80.
I would bet the ranch on Obama winning in 2012.