Enhance
Administrator
Well, like I said, it comes down to how you relay those experiences to people. All of us, in essence, "live in the past," because our personalities are dictated by our experiences. It's who we are and what we rely on. That's fine, but Jason Peter is kind of like that vegan internet meme. "How do you know someone is a vegan? Don't worry, they'll tell you." And like my mathematician example, I hear people say the exact same things Peter says, and they're not former players. Often times, and this is the real issue I have with him, there's no substance to what he's saying. Sure, he can compare today to yesterday and tell me all the ways yesterday was better, but that doesn't matter to me. And if it feels like every time I hear Peter that's exactly what I get. Maybe I haven't listened to him enough - I don't know. But I can only go off of my experiences, and each time I turned him on, it was the same song and dance.I have agreed with some of his criticisms in the past. Further, I found his interplay with Jeff "The Nancy Boy" Wilkerson to be amusing.
Sure, he lives in the past, but isn't that inherent in anyone with experience? Unless we get Rex Burkhead to host a show, nobody on the air is going to have insight into anything that isn't from the past.
I agree, for the most part. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion, except when you treat that opinion as gold. I'm not one to say "You can't criticize people if you couldn't do their job", because that's B.S., but I do think you should level your criticisms out if you aren't in their position. Peter has no boundaries in this regard, which is why I can't stand him. He speaks like he genuinely knows exactly how to get Nebraska football back to championships, but instead of giving learned and constructive criticisms, he spends most of his time just ranting.I'll admit that I haven't listened to him since he had his show in Lincoln so I couldn't tell you if his "schtick" has changed. But that is probably what I liked the least about Jason, loved his book and his work at Nebraska just not what I perceive his attitude to be. Let me just be clear that I have no problem bragging about past titles and glory, as long as there is someone alive that is old enough to remember them and give it a context (i.e. the modern era of football).
I guess living in the past is hard to define, but to me it's just someone who can't get over the fact that things have changed and aren't going to be like they were. The old "back in my day" line is a dead give away to me that someone is living in the past. "back in my day we used to do this, this and this" well guess what it's not back in your day anymore and unfortunately things will probably never be that way again. Rules change, limits change, people have changed. Just because you were tough as nails and talented doesn't mean that guys who play today are weak moma's boys that can't perform. Maybe he's changed but it seems like that was the way he talked here in Lincoln, and maybe I'm ranting incoherently here but I just feel like he didn't have respect for his Alma mater anymore.
Last edited by a moderator: