Are you talking in terms of officiating? Or in terms of pooping our pant when we had another tailor-madechance to kick their teeth in?I thought the 2010 Texas game was far more outrageous than the 2009 game.
Me neither. We had that game won, but then we deserved to lose it at that point. Colt McCoy almost screwed it up by hilariously taking nearly 13 seconds on a play that started with the clock running, and I think they had a timeout anyway, but by that point it had already gone from "We're gonna win" to "Oh god, I hope they don't have a decent kicker." We came up short, as we do in some games, but sometimes we get deflected balls and Hail Marys and 57-yard field goals.Would the people who constantly bring this up feel good about the win, knowing that the game was ended because of a referee error? I sure wouldn't.
The latter. I was actually proud and optimistic after the 2009 game, but pessimistic and deflated after the 2010 game. 2010 was a perfect recipe to finally put the smack down on Texas with furious vengeance. But they blew it.Are you talking in terms of officiating? Or in terms of pooping our pant when we had another tailor-madechance to kick their teeth in?I thought the 2010 Texas game was far more outrageous than the 2009 game.
This is a serious question
And this is about the dumbest reply I've heard, because officials actually do that. Routinely officials ask for clocks to be reset or have time added back to them.That's about the dumbest argument I've heard. You really want to stop after each dead ball and review whether the clock was stopped exactly correctly? Or because the game isn't stopped to make sure after each and every tackle the ball is spotted at precisely the right spot they shouldn't review whether someone made it across the goal line for a touchdown?Again--the problem lies with the inconsistent officiating, and not the last :01, per se--the officials let time bleed off the clock the whole game, but they decide on this last play, when it obviously favors Texass, to change what they had done all game long and put time back on the clock?
Everybody always talked about how we got screwed in the 94 (93 season) Orange Bowl, yet the clock read 0:00, Bowden got a gatorade bath, but 2 seconds were put back on the clock, and btw we had time to get the FG unit out there which we might not have been able to do had the refs simply moved the chains immediately and restarted the clock. We missed the FG so people forget.
After every dead ball (which is what I said)? No, they don't. They absolutely don't. They might do it a couple times a game on average.And this is about the dumbest reply I've heard, because officials actually do that. Routinely officials ask for clocks to be reset or have time added back to them.That's about the dumbest argument I've heard. You really want to stop after each dead ball and review whether the clock was stopped exactly correctly? Or because the game isn't stopped to make sure after each and every tackle the ball is spotted at precisely the right spot they shouldn't review whether someone made it across the goal line for a touchdown?Again--the problem lies with the inconsistent officiating, and not the last :01, per se--the officials let time bleed off the clock the whole game, but they decide on this last play, when it obviously favors Texass, to change what they had done all game long and put time back on the clock?
Everybody always talked about how we got screwed in the 94 (93 season) Orange Bowl, yet the clock read 0:00, Bowden got a gatorade bath, but 2 seconds were put back on the clock, and btw we had time to get the FG unit out there which we might not have been able to do had the refs simply moved the chains immediately and restarted the clock. We missed the FG so people forget.
Or do you not f*****g watch football?
Husker Fan Rule #3- thou shalt NEVER give the Texass Whorns the benefit of the doubt or afford them one kind thought, ever. 1 demerit recorded.Would the people who constantly bring this up feel good about the win, knowing that the game was ended because of a referee error? I sure wouldn't.
I'm just playing devil's advocate here, Moiraine. I actually agree with the call. As much as I hate the Whorns, winning that game meant a lot more to them then it would have to us. IIRC, they were ranked very highly that year and went on to play in a BCS bowl.
Same here. My first and only road trip to a Husker game. I think this is why I have trouble making another.2009 BigXII CCG was my first Husker road trip. And boy was it memorable. Elation to heartbreak in the span of a minute or two. Brutal.
Equally gun-shy here. My resume includes 2001 Rose Bowl, 2006 USC (2007, as well, but we'll keep with road games), and 2011 Michigan.Same here. My first and only road trip to a Husker game. I think this is why I have trouble making another.2009 BigXII CCG was my first Husker road trip. And boy was it memorable. Elation to heartbreak in the span of a minute or two. Brutal.