2014 NCAA Regional Projections

So after doing some research the unofficial "official" stat on the number of runs we have allowed with 2 outs is 81 earned runs, 5 unearned runs. Totaling 86 runs scored with two outs. I did not count any runs that were scored via sacrifice. This would be determined as a runner on third and tagging up during a fly ball that would result in the second out same with a sac bunt, even though I don't believe that has been attempted against us. Nebraska pitching has given up 201 runs overall. With 86 of those coming with 2 outs, that results in 42.8% of our runs allowed happened with two outs. That is just amazing.
+1

wow is right (wow for you putting in the work lol) i felt like we may have an amazing statistic here for the simple reason that it seemed like everytime the huskers were always getting into trouble with 2 outs.... this is wow

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that we just created a new category for defensive/pitching statistics!! lol we keep RISP why not RA2O
Exactly, The only bad thing about it, was I had to look through the live stats of every game and check the innings the opponent scored and see if they scored with two outs. I feel as if RA2O should be way below what we are allowing. I could see what the average of the top 10 teams is but I will need to do that over the weekend, since that is a lot of work lol.

 
the statisticians should def be doing this so you dont have to!!! LOL
I know! This stat is just as important! But in all seriousness I may make a seperate thread comparing our stats to the stats of the "upper tier" college baseball teams.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that we just created a new category for defensive/pitching statistics!! lol we keep RISP why not RA2O
Exactly, The only bad thing about it, was I had to look through the live stats of every game and check the innings the opponent scored and see if they scored with two outs. I feel as if RA2O should be way below what we are allowing. I could see what the average of the top 10 teams is but I will need to do that over the weekend, since that is a lot of work lol.
The fact that you went through and did this stat is amazing. And having played college baseball I can tell you at the very least that our team did not keep track of this stat. Should it be kept? I think so. So many pitching coaches harp and getting out of innings once you get the second out. +1 to you and if you create that separate thread I'll be more than happy to chime in on it.

 
I think that we just created a new category for defensive/pitching statistics!! lol we keep RISP why not RA2O
Exactly, The only bad thing about it, was I had to look through the live stats of every game and check the innings the opponent scored and see if they scored with two outs. I feel as if RA2O should be way below what we are allowing. I could see what the average of the top 10 teams is but I will need to do that over the weekend, since that is a lot of work lol.
The fact that you went through and did this stat is amazing. And having played college baseball I can tell you at the very least that our team did not keep track of this stat. Should it be kept? I think so. So many pitching coaches harp and getting out of innings once you get the second out. +1 to you and if you create that separate thread I'll be more than happy to chime in on it.
I started to work on it last night, the problem I encountered was the fact that I came accross some box scores that did not include a Play-by-play.

 
I think that we just created a new category for defensive/pitching statistics!! lol we keep RISP why not RA2O
Exactly, The only bad thing about it, was I had to look through the live stats of every game and check the innings the opponent scored and see if they scored with two outs. I feel as if RA2O should be way below what we are allowing. I could see what the average of the top 10 teams is but I will need to do that over the weekend, since that is a lot of work lol.
The fact that you went through and did this stat is amazing. And having played college baseball I can tell you at the very least that our team did not keep track of this stat. Should it be kept? I think so. So many pitching coaches harp and getting out of innings once you get the second out. +1 to you and if you create that separate thread I'll be more than happy to chime in on it.
I started to work on it last night, the problem I encountered was the fact that I came accross some box scores that did not include a Play-by-play.
That's weird. I thought most schools kept a play-by-play for games. Would be interesting to see Nebraska stacked up against the Top 10 schools like you mentioned.

 
According to the Warren Nolan RPI (uses same formula as NCAA), Nebraska was at #36 prior to NW series. "The Nitty Gritty Report" they have ranks all teams by RPI and highlights thiose that are leading their respective conference. Right now if all leaders won thier conference (31 teams), that would leave 33 at large bids. However, Omaha is one of them and can't play post-season. That makes 34 open slots. By that, Nebraska currently would have to be at least #47 if they go from top down and give at large bids. After the loss on Friday, we only dropped to #40. After Saturday though, we dropped down to #56. Now this week, with no games played by the Huskers, teams that we've beaten have helped out by winning along with some of the teams right around us getting beat. We've climed back up to #48.

If we can just go out and win about 10 out of the last 14, we should move up to about #40 and still get an at-large bid. Just take care of our own business, and let the rest take care of itself!!!

 
According to the Warren Nolan RPI (uses same formula as NCAA), Nebraska was at #36 prior to NW series. "The Nitty Gritty Report" they have ranks all teams by RPI and highlights thiose that are leading their respective conference. Right now if all leaders won thier conference (31 teams), that would leave 33 at large bids. However, Omaha is one of them and can't play post-season. That makes 34 open slots. By that, Nebraska currently would have to be at least #47 if they go from top down and give at large bids. After the loss on Friday, we only dropped to #40. After Saturday though, we dropped down to #56. Now this week, with no games played by the Huskers, teams that we've beaten have helped out by winning along with some of the teams right around us getting beat. We've climed back up to #48.

If we can just go out and win about 10 out of the last 14, we should move up to about #40 and still get an at-large bid. Just take care of our own business, and let the rest take care of itself!!!
havig losses to teams like arky and Ucirvine etc... who keep winning games helps this out alot. tougher schedules get results... but yes as 4life says... im all for winning the conference to give us a shot...

do i think we can make a run to Omaha? probably not... BUT if this teams can fix their inconsistencies on offense and keep up the pretty damn good pitching who knows

 
I really think if they could just get to the post season this year, and gain some experience there we would be really sitting in good position for next year if they all keep their heads straight.

 
Back
Top