MyBloodIsRed16
Active member
Don't really think it matters when he jumped ship. Only matters if it stays that way.Yeah, wouldn't shock me if it was even before that.
Don't really think it matters when he jumped ship. Only matters if it stays that way.Yeah, wouldn't shock me if it was even before that.
I understand your point but I think any amount of over-signing will be due to expected attrition. This class will have a good amount of HS recruits even if it seems like we are taking a lot of JUCOs.Glad to see they’re going after some jucos, but a little worried this class of incoming freshman will be so small and lead to some class imbalance. Will be less than 15 by the time they graduate.
Are we taking a lot of Juco's? They have to sign first. We were taking a lot of 4*s before they started decommittingI understand your point but I think any amount of over-signing will be due to expected attrition. This class will have a good amount of HS recruits even if it seems like we are taking a lot of JUCOs.
It wouldn’t surprise me to get a number around, or over, 25. Just means some guys are moving on. The rumor going around is that some of the attrition “will cause panic, but ultimately be good for the team.”
Obviously. But the staff is offering a lot of JUCOs and it stands to reason that they’re going to try to sign some of them. Minn was expressing some concern on if we were going to take too many, I’m simply saying the numbers will work either way.Are we taking a lot of Juco's? They have to sign first. We were taking a lot of 4*s before they started decommitting
I assume some attrition as well, but do you think it will happen by signing day or after spring ball when these kids and coaches can get a feel?I understand your point but I think any amount of over-signing will be due to expected attrition. This class will have a good amount of HS recruits even if it seems like we are taking a lot of JUCOs.
It wouldn’t surprise me to get a number around, or over, 25. Just means some guys are moving on. The rumor going around is that some of the attrition “will cause panic, but ultimately be good for the team.”
Well I would assume they will try the same tactic next year depending on how things shake out this year. Probably go heavy Juco the first two years then start tapering down to 1 or 2 each year.Obviously. But the staff is offering a lot of JUCOs and it stands to reason that they’re going to try to sign some of them. Minn was expressing some concern on if we were going to take too many, I’m simply saying the numbers will work either way.
We need a JUCO at OLB, OT, and DB at the very least in my opinion. Seems like the staff is trying hard for a JUCO TE, RB, and WR as well. We will have to see what all happens in the next month.
This is really the worst type of post.Get ready for some more good news.
Woodyard committed are you happy? I said get ready so I don’t know why you’re madThis is really the worst type of post.
All of these de-commits and commits are exactly why paying attention to recruiting the last month of the season seemed like a waste af time.
We we will replace the de-commits
I think he meant the last month of this season, not the last month of seasons in general. I usually follow recruiting some, but I haven't bothered since it became obvious Riley would be fired.I mean, to each his own.
But trying to use a year with a coaching change as an example of this isn't really taking much of an honest look at it.
I think he meant the last month of this season, not the last month of seasons in general. I usually follow recruiting some, but I haven't bothered since it became obvious Riley would be fired.