BigRedBuster
Active member
That really doesn’t answer the question.They are ranked in the top 20 & we are not.
That really doesn’t answer the question.They are ranked in the top 20 & we are not.
Sure it does, both the media & coaches think Creighton is a better team.That really doesn’t answer the question.
To answer the question, is to explain why.Sure it does, both the media & coaches think Creighton is a better team.
Thedy didn't get blown out by Iowa, Maryland, Wisconsin & Creighton. Huskers are playing really well right now, but the Huskers have some blowout losses earlier in the season. Creighton is 12-8 in quads 1-2, Huskers are 7-8.If we win out, are we a 6 or 7 seed? Someone explain why Creighton with the same record is a 3 or 4 seed? Are they a legacy like Pinto and Flounder of the Delta house and get an easy start?
Thank you! This is what I was getting at. It's very simple: quad 1 & 2 record. Big 10 is getting very little respect due to the blue bloods being at the bottom of the conference.Thedy didn't get blown out by Iowa, Maryland, Wisconsin & Creighton. Huskers are playing really well right now, but the Huskers have some blowout losses earlier in the season. Creighton is 12-8 in quads 1-2, Huskers are 7-8.
Polls never mean anything in basketball.Creighton's NET is 11. Nebraska's is 41. Simplest way to describe the discrepancy. Don't bother with the polls they don't mean much for March Madness.
For further reason as to why they look different with similar records is that the B1G isn't very good and if I remember right we only got Purdue, Illinois, Wiscy, and MSU once so really about as weak of a conference SOS as you can get. Creighton is also tied for the most road wins in the Power 6 which the computers love, something basically every pundit said for weeks was holding Nebraska's resume back.
Creighton has the 12th toughest schedule in the country while Nebraska has the 43rd toughest schedule (and we're probably gonna drop a bit because the last 3 games are against the dregs of the Big Ten). Also Creighton is 2.5 games better in Quad 1&2 games. The pitiful nonconference scheduling was always going to prevent us from locking in a 5 seed or better without a really dominant conference record.Someone explain why Creighton with the same record is a 3 or 4 seed? Are they a legacy like Pinto and Flounder of the Delta house and get an easy start?
We split with Wisconsin this year, but otherwise yeah, exactly this. Not playing anyone except Creighton and KSU in the nonconference + lucking out with the easiest possible conference schedule kind of put a cap on Nebraska's seeding possibilities this year without doing something crazy like running the table in the B1GCreighton's NET is 11. Nebraska's is 41. Simplest way to describe the discrepancy. Don't bother with the polls they don't mean much for March Madness.
For further reason as to why they look different with similar records is that the B1G isn't very good and if I remember right we only got Purdue, Illinois, Wiscy, and MSU once so really about as weak of a conference SOS as you can get. Creighton is also tied for the most road wins in the Power 6 which the computers love, something basically every pundit said for weeks was holding Nebraska's resume back.
Yeah, Big Ten is way down this year.Thank you! This is what I was getting at. It's very simple: quad 1 & 2 record. Big 10 is getting very little respect due to the blue bloods being at the bottom of the conference.