How's everyone feeling about their team's picks last night?
Cowboys added some value by trading back and got the guy they seemed to want all along. I do worry that he played RT almost exclusively. Although he didn't allow a sack last year.
Bo Nix time in Denver... Seemed a little high but sounds like that's they Payton wanted @Mavric
49ers took a WR? Have to get @Guy Chamberlin's take on that
Bo Nix time in Denver... Seemed a little high but sounds like that's they Payton wanted @Mavric
The consensus seemed to be that 12 was too high for Nix but I don't think they had much choice, especially after the Falcons drafted Penix (?????). It would have been nice to trade down 8-10 spots and still get Nix or Penix but the Raiders were heavily rumored to be looking to draft a QB as well and there was too much risk.
Payton was going to get a QB. It seemed like he may have preferred McCarthy but liked Nix almost as well. There was talk of the Broncos trading up to take McCarthy but given all the picks they've given up over the last few years, not having to do that and still getting someone you want is probably about as good as they hoped for.
I like that Nix started a ton of games in college. One-year wonders don't seem to work out very well. There seem to be a lot of questions about how his experience will translate to the NFL ("all he did was throw bubble screens"). Only 44 of his 398 attempts were more than 20 yards downfield. But he was still very efficient on those throws (52.3%, 12 TDs, 1 INT). And 37 TDs with 2 INTs is awfully good. The NFL is an accuracy game. You have to be able to stretch the field to loosen things up but being able to put most passes where they need to be is paramount. Nix seems to be good at that.
I actually would have been good with any of Nix, Penix or McCarthy. And the Broncos had to do something to try to get the QB spot figured out. So it seems to have worked out about as well as it could have.
RE: Taking a pick too high
I don't know about anyone else, but this is one of those annoying things draft analysts say every year.
Mathing it out, it makes sense on the surface. You value a player at a certain spot and don't want to spend any more than you need to get that pick. The logic breaks down when you quickly realize you have picks at set intervals. Usually that is 32 picks apart, but in Denver's case they didn't have a 2nd round pick, so that pick is now 64 picks apart. Is Bo Nix still there at 76? Probably not. That leaves the option of trading down/up to maximize your pick slot.
The only thing more annoying is everyone suggesting a team should trade down. Everyone knows trading down is usually a high value play, and because of that, very few teams want to trade up. One of the few positions worth trading up for, especially in this draft, is QB.
Denver didn't have a lot of options here and everyone knew that when Russ was cut. As the draft got closer and closer and it became more and more apparent a lot of QBs would go early, Denver had their hands tied as to what choice of QB they may get. The didn't have the draft capital to move around the board, and they were pretty desperate for a QB. The fact next year's QB class doesn't look great also likely played a big part in many teams making the QB decisions they did.
Then they grab this Pearsall guy, despite there being several WRs on the board rated higher.
Depending on Minn.... let's say Penix is there at #12, what say you? Or JJ?
I don't think HCSP can handle skipping another year with no one to mold, whilst dealing with another vet again. He needs "a guy" this year.
RE: Taking a pick too high
I don't know about anyone else, but this is one of those annoying things draft analysts say every year.
Mathing it out, it makes sense on the surface. You value a player at a certain spot and don't want to spend any more than you need to get that pick. The logic breaks down when you quickly realize you have picks at set intervals. Usually that is 32 picks apart, but in Denver's case they didn't have a 2nd round pick, so that pick is now 64 picks apart. Is Bo Nix still there at 76? Probably not. That leaves the option of trading down/up to maximize your pick slot.
The only thing more annoying is everyone suggesting a team should trade down. Everyone knows trading down is usually a high value play, and because of that, very few teams want to trade up. One of the few positions worth trading up for, especially in this draft, is QB.
Denver didn't have a lot of options here and everyone knew that when Russ was cut. As the draft got closer and closer and it became more and more apparent a lot of QBs would go early, Denver had their hands tied as to what choice of QB they may get. The didn't have the draft capital to move around the board, and they were pretty desperate for a QB. The fact next year's QB class doesn't look great also likely played a big part in many teams making the QB decisions they did.
Because the gap to the next guy is A LOT.