2nd Debate Discussion

yeah, and it is nothing more than one person's interpretation of what he said. nothing more nothing less.

Mitt is interpreting it one way, and she another.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
huskerXman said:
yeah, and it is nothing more than one person's interpretation of what he said. nothing more nothing less.

Mitt is interpreting it one way, and she another.
Click to expand...
Mitt is interpreting it incorrectly. Kind of like interpreting Mitt saying he doesn't and won't concern himself with 47% of the country as Mitt saying he's very concerned with the well-being of 47% of the country.

 
huskerXman said:
yeah, and it is nothing more than one person's interpretation of what he said. nothing more nothing less.

Mitt is interpreting it one way, and she another.
Click to expand...
No . . . your spin isn't necessary. It's a matter of record. Mitt's either mistaken or lying. Take your pick.

 
knapplc said:
huskerXman said:
yeah, and it is nothing more than one person's interpretation of what he said. nothing more nothing less.

Mitt is interpreting it one way, and she another.
Click to expand...
Mitt is interpreting it incorrectly. Kind of like interpreting Mitt saying he doesn't and won't concern himself with 47% of the country as Mitt saying he's very concerned with the well-being of 47% of the country.
Click to expand...
But he is concerned with 47% of the country, the 47% that resides in the other 53%

 
knapplc said:
huskerXman said:
yeah, and it is nothing more than one person's interpretation of what he said. nothing more nothing less. Mitt is interpreting it one way, and she another.
Click to expand...
Mitt is interpreting it incorrectly. Kind of like interpreting Mitt saying he doesn't and won't concern himself with 47% of the country as Mitt saying he's very concerned with the well-being of 47% of the country.
Click to expand...
In your opinion. Fact is he didn't call this act itself and act of terror..

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,"

All he said was no acts of terror..

 
huskerXman said:
In your opinion. Fact is he didn't call this act itself and act of terror..

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,"

All he said was no acts of terror..
Click to expand...
Holy..... wow! You are right! How did I not see this before? That is totally different. It's like-- it's like a whole 'nother language almost. He may as well have delivered that statement in Greek it's so different.

My eyes are finally opened. Hallelujah! It's a miracle.

 
knapplc said:
huskerXman said:
In your opinion. Fact is he didn't call this act itself and act of terror..

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,"

All he said was no acts of terror..
Click to expand...
Holy..... wow! You are right! How did I not see this before? That is totally different. It's like-- it's like a whole 'nother language almost. He may as well have delivered that statement in Greek it's so different.

My eyes are finally opened. Hallelujah! It's a miracle.
Click to expand...

Glad you finally saw the truth. I knew you would come around!

 
Canttakeitanymore said:
http://cnnpressroom....-debate-moment/
Click to expand...
No need for an appeal to authority. Everyone can read it for themselves.

http://www.whitehous...ssy-staff-libya

You guys (not directed at you Cant) might want to think about what you're doing. Every minute spent mindlessly defending Romney on this obvious mistake/falsehood helps President Obama. The conservative spin is in obvious conflict with reality . . . and many/most Republicans are choosing their own propaganda. I've often questioned Romney's lack of respect for his voters . . . but it looks like he might have been right all along.

It is rather funny seeing the first post-truth campaign's reaction to confronting actual facts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top