2nd Debate Discussion

EZ-E said:
Then his press secretary should be fired for misrepresenting him. So should Susan Rice.
Click to expand...
Let's do it! That'll bring those 4 Americans back to life!

One more time: People are dead. Is that more or less important than the inconsistency of the message after their deaths?

 
carlfense said:
EZ-E said:
Then his press secretary should be fired for misrepresenting him. So should Susan Rice.
Click to expand...
Let's do it! That'll bring those 4 Americans back to life!

One more time: People are dead. Is that more or less important than the inconsistency of the message after their deaths?
Click to expand...
All I want his him to admit that something is for once in his life his fault. Not that they are dead, but he did not take the steps to protecting the embassy when they requested more security in March. Or when they pulled two teams out of there in August. If he wants to claim responsibility for Bin Laden's death, admit that the intell agents are right and that Al Queda (spelling) is alive and well as they testified in that hearing. Instead of kneeling in front of the Chinese and hugging Venezuelan dictators, and even telling Russia he will be more flexible in a second term, maybe actually showing some back bone. To defend his foreign policy is insane.

 
EZ-E said:
All I want his him to admit that something is for once in his life his fault.
Click to expand...
You must have not watched the debate, eh?

nod.gif


EZ-E said:
To defend his foreign policy is insane.
Click to expand...
Right . . . :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
carlfense said:
chamrocck said:
carlfense said:
2) Since Obama continually referenced the event as spontaneous for 2 weeks after it happened, then you have just proven that Obama could not have been referencing Benghazi when he said acts of terror in the Rose Garden.
Click to expand...
Show me where President Obama referred to the Benghazi attack as a "spontaneous attack."

I won't say "game, set, match" unless and until you are unable to provide the quote. Good luck, sir. I recommend Google. How long do you require?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I never said Obama made the exact quote and will admit that I could have been clearing in saying the Obama administration has referenced the Benghazi incident as spontaneous. To deny that the Obama administration mislead the public on Benghazi is to ignore the proof I gave above where he sent out his lackeys to mislead and do damage control on this issue. Obama himself says a "video sparked outrage throughout the the muslim world".

Interesting how the general acts of terror comment in you opinion must be specifically talking about Benghazi but when he talks about it at the UN, well he can't be referring to Benghazi in those comments? Nicely fits your agenda. Awesome. :lol:

People died, Obama lied. I will be watching Monday night to see what Obama says next.

 
chamrocck said:
I never said Obama made the exact quote . . .
Click to expand...
Did someone hack your account? Not only did you say that Obama referenced it . . . you said that he referenced it continually.

chamrocck said:
2) Since Obama continually referenced the event as spontaneous for 2 weeks after it happened . . .
Click to expand...
chamrocck said:
To deny that the Obama administration mislead the public on Benghazi is to ignore the proof I gave above where he sent out his lackeys to mislead and do damage control on this issue.
Click to expand...
The CIA disagrees. Why should we believe you over them?

chamrocck said:
Obama himself says a "video sparked outrage throughout the the muslim world".
Click to expand...
Yes he did and yes it did.

chamrocck said:
I will be watching Monday night to see what Obama says next.
Click to expand...
I hope that you do. Remember, there will be both video and transcripts. Not that those things have stopped certain people in the past . . . :lol:

 
Doubts surface over e-mail on claim of responsibility for Benghazi attack


Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, and two other Republicans in the Senate wrote Wednesday to Obama, saying: "These emails make clear that your Administration knew within two hours of the attack that it was a terrorist act and that Ansar al-Sharia, a Libyan militant group with links to Al-Qaeda, had claimed responsibility for it."

However, an examination of the known Facebook and Twitter accounts of Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi reveals no such claim of responsibility. Aaron Zelin, a research fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, tracks dozens of jihadist websites and archives much of what they say. He told CNN he was unaware of any such claim having been posted on the official Facebook page or Twitter feed of Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi.

Zelin, who said his RSS feed sends him any new statement from the group, provided CNN with a copy of that feed. It shows no Facebook update between September 8 and September 12, when a posting late that afternoon first referenced the attack. Zelin notes that the posting referred to a news conference the group had held earlier that day in Benghazi in which it denied any role in the assault on the consulate, while sympathizing with the attackers.

Accompanying a posting of the news conference on YouTube, a commentary says that the attack on the consulate was "a wave of rage for Allah and his Prophet, it came from the Muslim youths."

The posting continues: "Ansar al-Sharia brigade did not officially participate as a military body, nor received any orders directed from the brigade."
Click to expand...
 
Condi Rice Pours Cold Water On ‘Benghazi-Gate’

Host Greta Van Susteren asked Rice directly and repeatedly about a set of emails uncovered by Reuters. In what has been dubbed “Benghazi-Gate,” the conservative media has jumped on the emails as definitive proof that the Obama administration has been lying about what it knew and when in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Rice’s response was likely not what Van Susteren expected:
RICE: But when things are unfolding very, very quickly, it’s
not always easy to know what is really going on
on the ground. And to my mind, the really important questions here are about how information was collected. Did the various agencies really coordinate and share intelligence in the way that we had hoped, with the reforms that were made after 9/11?
So there’s a big picture to be examined here. But we don’t have all of the pieces, and I think it’s easy to try and jump to conclusions about what might have happened here. It’s probably better to let the relevant bodies do their work.
Click to expand...
 
Those two bolded things in your post, sd'sker, are what several of us have been saying all along. It's nice to hear someone you respect like Condi Rice say the same thing. It's only the truth.

 
sd said:
Condi Rice Pours Cold Water On ‘Benghazi-Gate’

Host Greta Van Susteren asked Rice directly and repeatedly about a set of emails uncovered by Reuters. In what has been dubbed “Benghazi-Gate,” the conservative media has jumped on the emails as definitive proof that the Obama administration has been lying about what it knew and when in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Rice’s response was likely not what Van Susteren expected:
RICE: But when things are unfolding very, very quickly, it’s
not always easy to know what is really going on
on the ground. And to my mind, the really important questions here are about how information was collected. Did the various agencies really coordinate and share intelligence in the way that we had hoped, with the reforms that were made after 9/11?
So there’s a big picture to be examined here. But we don’t have all of the pieces, and I think it’s easy to try and jump to conclusions about what might have happened here. It’s probably better to let the relevant bodies do their work.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Good find. It's just too bad the current administration didn't follow this advice themselves and instead hit the late night talk shows blaming this on the youtube video and let it get to this point in the first place.

 
Junior said:
Should Obama hold a press conference every time a CIA memo comes across his desk, or should they work to verify it first?
Click to expand...
When there is a terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 that kills our ambassador and 3 other Americans, yes Obama better damn well tell us what happened. Why is it OK for the American people to still be waiting for the truth a month and a half after the event?

 
Back
Top