ZRod
Active member
You're Clemson?Well when you’re a national powerhouse and the rest of your conference sucks…
You're Clemson?Well when you’re a national powerhouse and the rest of your conference sucks…
I'd say T-Mart. But I think Adrian is a more complete QB then Taylor was. BUT Taylor was alot more successful then Adrian has been thus far in his career
Both have their positives and negatives, I wouldnt describe either as a "complete" QB. Both have good running ability, one was a straight line guy with great top end and poor lateral, the other has good lateral speed and explosiveness when needed. Both were good teammates and represent the brand well. Both were supportive of the coaching staff and played through injuries- good kids.
Both have a strong tendency to give away the football via the fumble. Both are prone to doing backyard football stuff to try and make plays- making poor decisions. Both have poor pocket awareness- take too many sacks. Both have a tendency to lock onto receivers early and telegraph their throws. Both will throw into double coverage and force plays instead of locating secondary targets. Adrian hasnt shown consistency in hitting deeper throws. Both throw too many interceptions.
The last QB that could have been "complete" was Joe Ganz and he may have needed better feet to have earned that title. Taylor was a much better big play runner. Its a real shame Joe got screwed over by Callahan- should have started 2 years instead of one.
Ganz was:
381/585 .651 5,125 8.8 per attempt
44/18 Ints 157 QBR
Taylor-
575/962 .598 7,258 7.4 per attempt 56/29 Ints
136 QBR
Tommy Armstrong. Guy wasn't a world beater...threw too many picks, but he also took chances and had a cannon to back it up. Over 90 TDs accounted for and over 10000 yards from scrimmage in his career. And he was our last "winning" quarterback.If we were to pose the question as, "Adrian Martinez is the best Husker quarterback since (fill in the blank)," what would/could we say?
Honestly.
Tommy Armstrong. Guy wasn't a world beater...threw too many picks, but he also took chances and had a cannon to back it up. Over 90 TDs accounted for and over 10000 yards from scrimmage in his career. And he was our last "winning" quarterback.
AD needs over 2700 total yards this year and 37 total TDs to match Armstrong's 4 years.
Regardless of the metric, best QB since Armstrong. Tommys offenses scored...and scored in bunches. It was a team effort for sure...but we'd all give our left nut for Tommy's era offensive stats this year.Quantity isn't a great metric for a quarterback. First, Tommy only had one season with a higher qbr than Adrian's lowest so far. Second, Adrian's worst years are better than Tommy's in completion percentage, rushing (edit: barely off on this one, Tommy had 721 one year), and they're pretty much identical in Y/A and AY/A.
If you average their career totals over the number of games played thus far, it breaks down like so:
Tommy per game (45 games) - 197.13 passing yards, 1.48 passing touchdowns, .97 interceptions, 40.4 rushing yards, .51 rushing touchdowns
Adrian per game (28 games) - 201 passing yards, 1.107 passing touchdowns, .71 interceptions, 63.42 rushing yards, .785 rushing touchdowns