walksalone
New member
Hopefully he realizes that there are three running backs at his disposal and not go full Watson thinking he's Don Coryell circa 1982.
4 if you wanna go there walks. There's no reason, absolutely none, why he should not fully utilize all four in a multitude of ways. Frankly, I feel if they don't get used right, we'll lose some games we need to and one that we shouldn't.Hopefully he realizes that there are three running backs at his disposal and not go full Watson thinking he's Don Coryell circa 1982.
Winner winner, chicken dinner4 if you wanna go there walks. There's no reason, absolutely none, why he should not fully utilize all four in a multitude of ways. Frankly, I feel if they don't get used right, we'll lose some games we need to and one that we shouldn't.Hopefully he realizes that there are three running backs at his disposal and not go full Watson thinking he's Don Coryell circa 1982.
All you have to do is look at both ucla games if you want an argument on Beck. Both games required a heavy concentration on power football, but he bailed them out by throwing the rock around; Last year NU only had a total of 42 rushing attempts but Taylor had 35 passing attempts. Abdullah and cross should have had between 50 and 60 carries that game.
The spotlight needs to be on coach Beck this year.
Good contribution to the thread, that was really helpful.What do I want to see from Tim Beck? More threads about him. Keep 'em coming, guys.
We did attempt a fair amount of seam passes. Problem was, QB and TE only made like one connection.Good contribution to the thread, that was really helpful.What do I want to see from Tim Beck? More threads about him. Keep 'em coming, guys.
I would honestly like to see our passing game incorporate "seam" passes to the tight ends much like Oregon does. Also, I never feel like there is a true rhythm to what he's doing. I don't know how much he "set's up" his plays for down the road in the game. I may not pay enough attention to that, and that would really take a lot of dissecting game film to figure out.
I already like our running game, so I would naturally just like to see him pick the right QB (whoever that is) and let the offense flourish. My philosophy is that if your QB isn't going to be a primary ball carrier in the running game, then why not use the best "balanced" athlete at the position?
Either way, I'm drinking kool-aid hard core at this point, because of the hopes I have for the defense.
Your not alone on that feeling man. It seems to be an issue. I was often frustrated on all the 3 & Outs we had last year in the 1st. This wasn't EVERY game, but from my memory, it was more often than not. You should get a good feel for how the defense is going to set after your first couple drives.4 quarters of offense. Specifically the 1st quarter. Not always, but often times I feel (and maybe it's not the case) like Beck spends the entire first quarter feeling out the defense. Other times of course (UCLA) he dominates the defense in the 1st, so he spends the rest of the game doing everything thing he can to mess up what he had working for him.
We need to hit that pass. Carter has been open far to many times to be over thrown on these routes. It seems like it happens once a game we could get an easy 6 or 30-40 yards only to see the ball over thrown.We did attempt a fair amount of seam passes. Problem was, QB and TE only made like one connection.Good contribution to the thread, that was really helpful.What do I want to see from Tim Beck? More threads about him. Keep 'em coming, guys.
I would honestly like to see our passing game incorporate "seam" passes to the tight ends much like Oregon does. Also, I never feel like there is a true rhythm to what he's doing. I don't know how much he "set's up" his plays for down the road in the game. I may not pay enough attention to that, and that would really take a lot of dissecting game film to figure out.
I already like our running game, so I would naturally just like to see him pick the right QB (whoever that is) and let the offense flourish. My philosophy is that if your QB isn't going to be a primary ball carrier in the running game, then why not use the best "balanced" athlete at the position?
Either way, I'm drinking kool-aid hard core at this point, because of the hopes I have for the defense.
I don't remember the statistic, but we scored a ridiculous percentage of our first drives last year. The problem is we come right back with 3 & outs.Your not alone on that feeling man. It seems to be an issue. I was often frustrated on all the 3 & Outs we had last year in the 1st. This wasn't EVERY game, but from my memory, it was more often than not. You should get a good feel for how the defense is going to set after your first couple drives.4 quarters of offense. Specifically the 1st quarter. Not always, but often times I feel (and maybe it's not the case) like Beck spends the entire first quarter feeling out the defense. Other times of course (UCLA) he dominates the defense in the 1st, so he spends the rest of the game doing everything thing he can to mess up what he had working for him.
No. A solid D performance, a 99 yrs play action pass, a brand new UGA QB, injuries etc...... Not taking away from the victory, but no, the cute motions haven't helped us since we started doing them. We continue to lead the nation in TO's? To much pre-snap motion to blame? Who knows. I just don't like it. Adds nothing IMO.lo country - those cute motions didn't help DONU beat Georgia?
This ↑ +1What do I want to see out of Beck/our offense?
1- Fewer turnovers. Sure a bunch of this falls squarely on the players themselves but the coaches can have them work on the right things and put them in better situations that will reduce turnovers.
2- I want to see Beck walk the talk about taking what the defense gives us. He says that all the time but most of the time it seems to me that he is trying to force square pegs into round holes. Too often he sticks with what isn't working, avoids things that are working, and it seems as if the puts the qb in a position to fail.
3- In game adjustments. This is basically number two all over again but his job is to find something/anything that will sustain drives and put points on the board. The best example of how he has failed at this is last years Minny game. He stayed with Martinez and play calling that was not working for way too long. Yes we had injuries etc. but he can't keep doing what isn't working and expect better results. I just don't know if he's stubborn, stupid, in over his head, or 2 or all 3 of these things. Imo, it requires a do whatever it takes mentality. I'm tired of the excuses for why the job doesn't get done even if many of the excuses are legit.