When you're asking Bo to reconfirm his commitment to Nebraska, note the name on the shirt he's wearing. Yeah, I'd think it's great if he's going to be all rah-rah, Nebraska forever, I'm your guy. That would be nice. But we also have to realize this is a business and he's a businessman, not just a coach. This isn't the 70s anymore, and salaries aren't modest. We're paying him three million bucks to coach here, and he's got to consider seriously if someone offers him 3.5 million, or four. He'd be dumb not to.
Near as I can remember, Bo only had one game with a timeclock blunder this year. May have had something to do with a first-year OC, but who knows. If we're claiming that no coaches beyond their third year have time management blunders, that's bogus.
You're welcome to continue pointing out every single mistake Bo makes. He makes a lot of them. He points them out as much as you do, actually. But if that's all you're going to talk about, don't expect to be taken seriously.
Husker fans haven't taken each other seriously since the Solich firing, actually it started before that as we had slid fairly far toward Shreveport losses. I understand the Rah, Rah, Rah, Osborne hired Pelini so lets all sit around and hold hands and sing folk songs and be happy beating terrible teams and losing to some not so great ones. I don't really expect to be taken seriously with the rah rah crowd but theres many of us out there tired of all these failed experiments. As booster start to wane, we will move on to the next, hopefully we grab someone like tOSU did
Ok, at the risk of feeding the troll, I'll play along.
If you're going to take the stance that Pelini is a failed experiment and we need to be looking for other answers, you need to at least consider the result of that stance. The biggest thing Pelini has brought to this program is stability. He's brought stability to an unstable program, and that's a great thing whether you choose to recognize it or not. If we toss him aside, that stability goes with him. It's easy to say "welp, hopefully we grab someone like tOSU did." But that's not an answer, it's a lot easier said than done. Doesn't the chances of grabbing someone like Urban Meyer dwindle to nonexistance if we fire someone for winning 9-10 games every year as a first time head coach? Nobody worth a damn is going to even consider that job. Isn't it much more likely we'll be right back to where we were when we hired Bo?
Also, nobody is saying they're satisfied with 9-10 wins every year. We all know what the end goal is. So stop arguing against that non-point, strawman.