The Dude
New member
I'm just glad the new guy has better nicknames.Can you Mo-Fos please stop talking about TMart?
I'm just glad the new guy has better nicknames.Can you Mo-Fos please stop talking about TMart?
No, the coaches and the media have been saying and reporting that this OL is the most athletic and deepest of the Pelini era. The last I checked the QB isn't a line position.Coaches, media reports, and the numbers say its not a coincidence that Tommmy makes his offensive line look better?Even though the coaches, media reports and the numbers say otherwise.You're right, some refuse to listen.Because it isn't and it's been said a thousand times. Some just refuse to listen.I don't think it's coincidence the offensive line has always looked better with Tommy in the pocket.TM never had an oline this good.
Please. Give me some evidence of that.
You know....you can't just spew crap and expect people to swallow it.
I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.Serious question and I'm not coming at your from a confrontational tone, what didn't you like about Tommy's performance on Saturday? He a few bad passes, absolutely. The overthrow to Ameer was bad, the near interception on the pass to Alonzo was a bad decision. The crazy catch with Westerkamp I would call an below average decision (not bad) but the CB made a really good play on the ball. It happens.Yes,Tommy has better footwork, I just wish that it would equal better results.But, haven't we been hearing that this is the deepest, most athletic OL in the Pelini era? I know I have.I don't think it's coincidence the offensive line has always looked better with Tommy in the pocket.TM never had an oline this good.
I think the 52% (15/29) completion percentage is what sticks out. But if you break that down a little more, you realize it's not terrible.
To start, one of those incompletions was the spike at the end of the first half, so can we agree that shouldn't count in his evaluation? Brings it to 54%.
Next, he very decisively threw 5 passes out of bounds. One can argue that this is actually a positive play. Things that can NOT happen when you throw the ball away include: interception, sack for big loss, fumble and turnover. Effectively brings it to 65%.
Two other incompletions were bombs that missed Kenny Bell grasp by literally inches. Both flew over 60 yards in air and both hit both of Kenny's hands. These aren't completions, but the effect of the throw helps alleviate the box and allows Ameer to operate. If we complete the pass, it's great, but the effect on the defense is greater just by having that as an option.
Overall, Tommy's job isn't to complete 70% of passes, he isn't supposed to Christian Hackenburg. His job is to not turn the ball over and put the defense in bad spots and to keep the down and distance manageable. He had 0 turnovers and I think we had 1 occasions where we were 2nd and greater than 10 and that was due to a penalty. He did his job Saturday.
You're getting way ahead of yourself there. Can you name a stat where Armstrong is better than Martinez?
That was the problem with TM. Statistically, he looked great on paper. However, that never translated into real life greatness.
Heck, Armstrong is 8-1 as a starter. That's the only stat that matters and it's better than anything TM put up.
I'm sure you know TM started 9-1, right?
You just made my point.
I agree. Officially he had 51.7%. But, there were three drops that I can remember. If those were caught, that jumps to 62%.Tommy's 52% completion percentage didn't bother me at all.
Strong throwing QBs in tight situations put the ball where if his WR can't catch the ball, no one will. I thought that aside from the Westerkatch and the bad throw that landed right into the FAU LB's arms, Tommy did a good job at that. If you're reading the articles and quotes from Tommy, he admits that he'd like to have 4 or 5 of his throws back. (2 long throws to Kenny, the screen to Ameer, etc.)I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.Serious question and I'm not coming at your from a confrontational tone, what didn't you like about Tommy's performance on Saturday? He a few bad passes, absolutely. The overthrow to Ameer was bad, the near interception on the pass to Alonzo was a bad decision. The crazy catch with Westerkamp I would call an below average decision (not bad) but the CB made a really good play on the ball. It happens.Yes,Tommy has better footwork, I just wish that it would equal better results.But, haven't we been hearing that this is the deepest, most athletic OL in the Pelini era? I know I have.I don't think it's coincidence the offensive line has always looked better with Tommy in the pocket.TM never had an oline this good.
I think the 52% (15/29) completion percentage is what sticks out. But if you break that down a little more, you realize it's not terrible.
To start, one of those incompletions was the spike at the end of the first half, so can we agree that shouldn't count in his evaluation? Brings it to 54%.
Next, he very decisively threw 5 passes out of bounds. One can argue that this is actually a positive play. Things that can NOT happen when you throw the ball away include: interception, sack for big loss, fumble and turnover. Effectively brings it to 65%.
Two other incompletions were bombs that missed Kenny Bell grasp by literally inches. Both flew over 60 yards in air and both hit both of Kenny's hands. These aren't completions, but the effect of the throw helps alleviate the box and allows Ameer to operate. If we complete the pass, it's great, but the effect on the defense is greater just by having that as an option.
Overall, Tommy's job isn't to complete 70% of passes, he isn't supposed to Christian Hackenburg. His job is to not turn the ball over and put the defense in bad spots and to keep the down and distance manageable. He had 0 turnovers and I think we had 1 occasions where we were 2nd and greater than 10 and that was due to a penalty. He did his job Saturday.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.
I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.
Iirc, didn't he have at least 3 turnovers? I remember him dropping one ball around our 5 yard line which led to a MSU TD, and he had that bad pitch to Newby pin the first series. I thought that there may have been one more, don't recall though.I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.![]()
It as a good pitch, Newby just flat out dropped it. He threw an interception that Bell slipped and fell down. Cant put that on him. He did fumble twice. One was an exchange between him and center, sometimes its on the QB, sometimes its on the center. Hard to tell with that. But he did not single handedly almost lose that game for us. Far from it.Iirc, didn't he have at least 3 turnovers? I remember him dropping one ball around our 5 yard line which led to a MSU TD, and he had that bad pitch to Newby pin the first series. I thought that there may have been one more, don't recall though.I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.![]()
The Int was Armstrong throwing outside and Bell going inside, a misread by Armstrong because he threw it directly to the DB. Bell slipped and fell because he tried to reach back to grab or at least touch the pass.It as a good pitch, Newby just flat out dropped it. He threw an interception that Bell slipped and fell down. Cant put that on him. He did fumble twice. One was an exchange between him and center, sometimes its on the QB, sometimes its on the center. Hard to tell with that. But he did not single handedly almost lose that game for us. Far from it.Iirc, didn't he have at least 3 turnovers? I remember him dropping one ball around our 5 yard line which led to a MSU TD, and he had that bad pitch to Newby pin the first series. I thought that there may have been one more, don't recall though.I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.![]()
I just went and watched all the turn overs from that game. The pitch was high and behind Newby, Kenny didn't fall down, Tommy just threw behind him (a theme is reoccurring here) and the alleged snap exchange was difficult to see, but Tommy had the ball in his hands (right on his hip) but didn't secure the ball. He was bumped by the pulling guard and dropped the ball.It as a good pitch, Newby just flat out dropped it. He threw an interception that Bell slipped and fell down. Cant put that on him. He did fumble twice. One was an exchange between him and center, sometimes its on the QB, sometimes its on the center. Hard to tell with that. But he did not single handedly almost lose that game for us. Far from it.Iirc, didn't he have at least 3 turnovers? I remember him dropping one ball around our 5 yard line which led to a MSU TD, and he had that bad pitch to Newby pin the first series. I thought that there may have been one more, don't recall though.I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.![]()
Of course it was worse than you thought, you don't like the guy. Everything is going to be bad in your eyes with Tommy.I just went and watched all the turn overs from that game. The pitch was high and behind Newby, Kenny didn't fall down, Tommy just threw behind him (a theme is reoccurring here) and the alleged snap exchange was difficult to see, but Tommy had the ball in his hands (right on his hip) but didn't secure the ball. He was bumped by the pulling guard and dropped the ball.It as a good pitch, Newby just flat out dropped it. He threw an interception that Bell slipped and fell down. Cant put that on him. He did fumble twice. One was an exchange between him and center, sometimes its on the QB, sometimes its on the center. Hard to tell with that. But he did not single handedly almost lose that game for us. Far from it.Iirc, didn't he have at least 3 turnovers? I remember him dropping one ball around our 5 yard line which led to a MSU TD, and he had that bad pitch to Newby pin the first series. I thought that there may have been one more, don't recall though.I didn't like the 52% completion percentage at all, considering the competition. Looking back at some of the highlights, many of those completions were underthrown or behind the receiver, and the receiver made a good play on them.
Fair enough about him throwing some balls away. Maybe on some of those throw aways, if he would have had better pocket presence and play making ability, he could have stepped up in the pocket and got a few yards instead of putting us in a hole.
Lastly, turnovers have been a huge problem, and Tommy had 2 INTs dropped. I can stomach him not being a playmaker if he makes good decisions and doesn't turn the ball over. But he pretty much single handedly lost the MSU game for us last year due to his turnovers.
If he plays the same against MSU as he did against FAU, we won't win.![]()
So, it was worse than I thought.
...wow, and i didn't think it could get any worse for you.So, it was worse than I thought.