GBRedneck
Banned
You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.Root for our new coach to do well.
It's more fun. Honestly.
Well maybe not as fun as you proving us wrong when Nebraska slides into the abyss, but good enough in the meantime.
You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.Root for our new coach to do well.
It's more fun. Honestly.
Well maybe not as fun as you proving us wrong when Nebraska slides into the abyss, but good enough in the meantime.
You're sig line indicates you're such a trooper when getting behind him and hoping he does well.You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.Root for our new coach to do well.
It's more fun. Honestly.
Well maybe not as fun as you proving us wrong when Nebraska slides into the abyss, but good enough in the meantime.
You know what they say about assumptions. Usually.You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.
Some unsolicited advice: find something else to enjoy in life, and come back either when Nebraska starts winning more, or hires a coach to your liking.Do I have the option of vetoing the hire and not giving him a chance?
But I do have to be honest. I don't "hope I'm wrong". I just don't really care any more.
Admin or not, that seems pretty uncool to copy something over here from the woodshed.You know what they say about assumptions. Usually.You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.
Some unsolicited advice: find something else to enjoy in life, and come back either when Nebraska starts winning more, or hires a coach to your liking.Do I have the option of vetoing the hire and not giving him a chance?
But I do have to be honest. I don't "hope I'm wrong". I just don't really care any more.
The proof was in your sig line.You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.Root for our new coach to do well.
It's more fun. Honestly.
Well maybe not as fun as you proving us wrong when Nebraska slides into the abyss, but good enough in the meantime.
No, it wasn't proof that I was rooting against him. There's sometimes a difference between what you think will happen and what you hope to happen.The proof was in your sig line.You're assuming I don't root for him to do well.Root for our new coach to do well.
It's more fun. Honestly.
Well maybe not as fun as you proving us wrong when Nebraska slides into the abyss, but good enough in the meantime.
Thanks for changing it.
Can we assume you didn't mean it?
Yes. But you don't hope you're wrong: "I don't 'hope I'm wrong'".There's sometimes a difference between what you think will happen and what you hope to happen.
I'll own my whole post, not your cherry picked selective quoting:Yes. But you don't hope you're wrong: "I don't 'hope I'm wrong'".There's sometimes a difference between what you think will happen and what you hope to happen.
The Woodshed is not private; it's opt in, not confidential. They're your words, so own them.
You made up your mind long ago and now you're here to take a leak in everyone's Cheerios. It's not a mystery that this would go unappreciated by most. Perhaps some day Riley will prove to be a disaster, or lose it and cuss out the fans. That'll be Christmastime for you, and you'll have plenty of choir to preach to then. Jumping the gun a little eagerly at the moment.
lol...you jumped off the bandwagon at the wrong time. and if you jumped off the bandwagon that long ago why the heck are you still here "sh#ttting, wiping, and flushing" the program with every post you make?I'll own my whole post, not your cherry picked selective quoting:Yes. But you don't hope you're wrong: "I don't 'hope I'm wrong'".There's sometimes a difference between what you think will happen and what you hope to happen.
The Woodshed is not private; it's opt in, not confidential. They're your words, so own them.
You made up your mind long ago and now you're here to take a leak in everyone's Cheerios. It's not a mystery that this would go unappreciated by most. Perhaps some day Riley will prove to be a disaster, or lose it and cuss out the fans. That'll be Christmastime for you, and you'll have plenty of choir to preach to then. Jumping the gun a little eagerly at the moment.
I feel the same as walksalone. I don't even know what you mean by "give him a chance". Do I have the option of vetoing the hire and not giving him a chance?
But I do have to be honest. I don't "hope I'm wrong". I just don't really care any more. I don't have any hope that he will do any good. I think he, and his staff even moreso, are in way over their heads. I guess if he does prove me wrong I'll be pleasantly surprised and I'll admit I was wrong and climb aboard the Husker train again. I like seeing an underdog come out on top once in awhile and Riley doing it would make for an awesome story. But, I don't think I can really get back to my old 1969-2003 level of Husker fandom until they get someone competent running the program.
Going out and hiring the first nice guy who will take the job just doesn't work. Anwhere! Especially at Nebraska. It's a unique place in the college football world. Devaney and Osborne laid out a perfect blueprint for making Husker football successful. Pederson took a sh#t on it, Pederhorst is wiping his a$$ with it and Perlman is dead set on flushing it. If somebody can recover it from the waste treatment plant, I'll definitely be back on board.
At some point the Moderators have to step in. When a person won't self-police, you have to do it for them.You made up your mind long ago and now you're here to take a leak in everyone's Cheerios. It's not a mystery that this would go unappreciated by most. Perhaps some day Riley will prove to be a disaster, or lose it and cuss out the fans. That'll be Christmastime for you, and you'll have plenty of choir to preach to then. Jumping the gun a little eagerly at the moment.
Lol. Some people will see what they want to see, and when they don't see what they want they make things up.Yeah, criticizing Mike Riley isn't the same as defending Bo Pelini. Except when that's exactly what it is.